reinstatement supitsdillon
-
-
Vouch.
-
If this is an actual reinstatement, object due to inactivity. Have to wonder how the hell this has lasted so long though, lmfao.
-
-
Object u always reinstate then go inactive shortly after I don’t trust you will be active
-
Need more up to date votes based on how he acts, not the circumstances before I can process this reinstatement.
-
↩ videogamesm12 the player is sporadically active on the forum, mostly voting on things, and is inactive in game - 40 minutes of active playtime in the last 30 days, and 7 hours of active playtime in the past 13 months.
I appreciate you wanting more feedback but I personally can't make judgement on how he acts considering I haven't seen enough of him to judge.
-
this has now been open for a year and I feel like it should be automatically accepted now
-
↩ @'dillon ' needs more time for voting sorry lad
-
-
It's actually been a whole year since this application has been posted... @"videogamesm12"#4 may wanna process this, took way too long.
-
↩ simplynick nah bro, theres not enough community input
-
-
Eh neutral, need to see what other people say about them first
-
This has literally been open for a year. This is an extenuating circumstance and honestly at this point we should approve it and go from there.... the fact that it wasn't processed earlier is unfair to the applicant.
-
Apologies for the... rather lengthy wait.
Reading back through everything again, this should technically have been denied about a year ago, since it can be assumed that you didn't manage the 3 hours within that week and it is an activity reinstatement. But we can't really tell for sure so I think an outright denial would be unfair.
I will be happy to reinstate you to your position with 3 hours of playtime within the next 7 days, as is normal with an inactivity reinstatement.
-
You failed time and time again to meet the activity requirement, as stated previously it should have been denied and you made to re-apply, but I think with changes in EAO and folks giving you the benefit of the doubt that got missed.
-
it's been almost a year and somehow dillon still has not managed to meet the time requirement
object -
I don’t understand how this hasn’t been denied a year ago. He continuously fails to meet activity requirements on the server.
-
↩ Ivan Yeah I mentioned it in voting (before I became videos assistant) that the applicant wasnt exactly the most active (playtime in last 14 months is less than the monthly required for admin), but since this wasn't reviewed when it should've been I have given a week for the 3 hours, as a benefit of doubt.
-