Small change to rule 3g

Changed to Neutral, Dragon has a good point, however, if an op put down a warp at an NSFW build, and then reported it, the op that put down the warp could probably be sanctioned for framing.

vouch

I would vouch, but wouldn’t this mean that if an op finds a nsfw build, they could put a warp there, and report the warp a day later and due to how the logs work we wouldn’t be able to know that they made the warp and so we would just sanction the build?

I Vouch. Also, given the ban of nsfw builds, etc, would it also make sense banning distribution of items whether consentual or not; containing links to NSFW or simply being NSFW content (ex. certain fanfic books)?

↩  DragonSlayer2189 I believe in this case the person who set up the warp should be sanctionned. Also, this rule is already in place, just not written down.

Quote

↩  Folfy_Blue the person who set up the warp should be sanctionne

due to how the logs work we wouldn’t be able to know that they made the warp

↩  Tizz they'd wait so long to report because they'd have malicious intent to frame the builder for the offence of having set the warp and the difficulty in finding the setwarp command from a few days ago wouldn't be worth it for a sec 3.

I vouch on the basis that NSFW warps remain allowed, but they just cannot be advertised publically (and privately, I'd like it to be a violation of the rule if someone who doesn't wanna see an nsfw warp is tricked into seeing it.)

There are over 2,500 warps and in order for this to be enforced staff members would have to go through every one pretty consistently. Which is a hassle if there ever was one.

I'm sorry, but cost benefit analysis says this is just not a good idea to outlaw something that's very hard to moderate.

↩  Folfy_Blue the reason why I specified reporting one day later is because of how our logs are set up, at the moment the only logs that admins can get is the latest.log file, meaning that whenever there’s a sever restart or if anything goes wrong, we don’t have those logs, and so this op could theoretically make a report after a restart or something like that and could effectively frame another person for putting a build at a warp.

I vouch for reasons above.

Quote

↩  erin vouch on the basis that NSFW warps remain allowed, but they just cannot be advertised publically (and privately, I'd like it to be a violation of the rule if someone who doesn't wanna see an nsfw warp is tricked into seeing it.)

Yeah I agree with this, as long as the builder of the nsfw build isn’t advertising the warp I think it’s fine

Quote

g. Pornographic / NSFW builds if in a 250 block radius of spawn or warp locations, advertisement of such builds or discussion of Pornographic / NSFW Content in the server chat.

To add to my above post this would then be rephrased to:

Quote

g. Pornographic / NSFW builds if in a 250 block radius of spawn, advertisement by the builder of such builds for NSFW builds, or discussion of Pornographic / NSFW Content in the public chat.

I switched server chat to public chat because of how many diffrent chat things we have (admin chat, guild chat, main chat, plot chat, etc.)

This should now be addressed into the overarching new community guidelines. If it's not let me know and I'll re-open this for conversation.