Object
A permanent ban is unnecessary. Intentions were not meant to cause harm. I still however think a lengthy ban is suitable.
Object
A permanent ban is unnecessary. Intentions were not meant to cause harm. I still however think a lengthy ban is suitable.
Vouch impersonation isn't cool
borderline harassing nathan as well
I vouch, even if the name doesn't actually match the real Nathaniel account, that doesn't magically loophole out of it.
It's an attempted impersonation. It's exactly the same if someone were to login as me under the name "JJJaguar200", sure it doesn't match exactly my name but its a clear attempt of impersonation. Dragon still hasn't learned their lesson that they aren't above the rules.
Quote@jjjaguar2000#2384 Dragon still hasn't learned their lesson that they aren't above the rules.
when did I ever say that lol, I genuinely forgot about the rule but that doesn't mean the suspension or even anything in this thread is invalid
@DragonSlayer2189#2385 If you forgot the rule then you haven't learned your lesson.
object, a perma ban over a joke is china 2.0 and china 2.0 isnt pog
Definitely vouch for a tempban as I want to discourage these sorts of 'jokes'. I'm neutral as to whether a permban is appropriate.
Approved.