Posts by jwmphall

Please Note: The TotalFreedom Forum has now been put into a read-only mode. Total Freedom has now closed down and will not be returning in any way, shape or form. It has been a pleasure to lead this community and I wish you all the best for your futures.

    1) What is your current Minecraft name (IGN)?

    jwmphall

    2) If you have a discord account, what is your discord username & discriminator (username#discriminator)?

    jwmphall#6704

    3) Why were you removed? (If you do not know, reach out to the ECD)

    I griefed a Minecraft server besides Total freedom.

    4) Will you help contribute to building projects when requested by the Executive Creative Designer (ECD)?

    Depends on the project

    5) How often will you be active as a MB on Total Freedom? (Daily, once a week etc.)

    Daily

    Quote

      simplynick fndndjdnsnsn How you understand and take my statements is none of my concern, as the video were NOT age-restricted and was safe to watch, yeah I’m not stupid because I check before showing it off.

    What kind of argument is this? Just because it isn't age restricted on Youtube (doubt you even used Youtube but I digress), does not mean it shouldn't be. You can find all sorts of NSFW things on Youtube not age restricted because the people who post them intentionally manipulate Youtube's automatic safety features. A show that is rated 18+ is still rated 18+ if its pirated to a third party site.

    Also, its no coincidence the scene shown is at the end of episode 1 of the show, and the time elapsed according to the screenshot is about 50 minutes. The fact that you claim you only showed a trailer or bits of the show is honestly comical. Especially because this scene is not in any trailer I can find.

    How is this even an argument?

    @'Ryan' for the record, I'm not the one who wrote this. I will defend what i agree with on principle, but i admit i don't back everything stated in the thread.

    Quote 2 (am on mobile now where formatting is hard so excuse the informality) I believe theyre referring to certain category 0 offenses, especially 0a. Certain players are banned for loose interpretations of 0a like Flobbier while a discord mod streams breaking bad on discord. 0a is an excuse for you to ban any player you want at almost any time because at some point most players have done something you could describe as illegal if you do enough mental gymnastics.

    Quote 3 - you provided evidence initially, but in the thread where i refuted the points you resorted to circular reasoning and privately attempted to change the ban to 0c, indicating even you realize it doesnt fall under 0a. I recall you stating "i can frankly ban whoever i want."

    Quote 4 - i was once banned for saying "i farted on your grandmas balls." an obvious joke. (Literally stolen from a meme that you can google) you later said it was because your grandmother passed away recently (sorry for your loss). but i had no way of knowing this and received no warning prior to the ban. this is anecdotal, but i can list several similar situations

    Quote 6 - dumbing things down and saying its just a minecraft server doesnt work ever since cat 0 was added. tf rules obviously mimic real life law, everybody knows that.

    Quote 7 - see my reply

    Again sorry for disjointed reply manner, mobile is a bitch.

      videogamesm12 That's the tricky bit. I believe if he were voted off he would be more courteous than in October, because of the vastly different circumstances. But nobody knows for sure. I wish I could make some people vote without fear of Ryan holding the server hostage, but that is the situation - to ignore it is naïve.

    jwmphall speaking:

    P2 and P3 - Ryan has excused several controversial additions by stating that he made it clear before he became owner what his intent was regarding AMG and the like. While this is true, the average player couldn’t have had any idea what that entailed at the time he was voted in (It was more important at the time to have stable ownership than worry about future repercussions) When the changes eventually went through, it was apparent that the community was opposed. This is when Ryan should have reevaluated his vision for the server to be more in line with the community wants.

    P4 - Yeah I was the one who made a big fuss about that so obviously my opinion is clear on the matter. Ryan has stated that Flobbier’s ban has been changed to a category 0c, meaning he apparently compromised the integrity of TotalFreedom or Atlas Media Group; neither of which are remotely applicable so I really don’t know. I was told by Ryan (paraphrasing): if I didn’t stop arguing Flobbier’s ban then Ryan would make it unappealable entirely. (meaning he would change it from 0a to 0b or 0c). Obviously, I didn’t stop, so Ryan changed the ban, completely bending the rules out of spite.

    P5 I agree. Though, in my opinion, Ryan is right about an owner not having to be friends with everybody, but I think it's evident that Ryan doesn’t even make an effort to do so.

    I vouch for the creation of a vote off, keep in mind this is a proposal, as only an executive can create the vote off itself. And yes I had this already typed out and ready

    Also, this is not the place for drama and powerposting. So just, don't