↩ @'fndndjdnsnsn' 
Posts by jwmphall
-
-
-
an activity requirement for a provided service seems a bit weird. seems like the only people who'll be affected by this are admins with tight schedules.
if i were an inactive admin and wanted to keep my rank, i would just join for 6 hours for two days then be gone the rest of the month, effectively changing nothingbetter idea imo is just reward activity instead of punishing inactivity.
-
↩ Wize "Jwmphall, If you do not want those DM's to be considered, then do not consider them in your reasoning."
what does that mean? i didn't want the dms to be considered until you leaked them. now it doesn't really matter.
"leave the drama for an appropriate section." great way to undermine legitimate points and questions. no admins are fighting here and there is no drama
-
↩ RedEastWood you prove your worth as an admin by being a good and helpful op. there are applications for a reason.
and if you don't think that lying and breaching trust is cause enough for a vote change then i don't know what would make you change. -
↩ RedEastWood if you need more proof of his untrustworthiness than the above then i recommend you revaluate your biases. you are an objective member of the staff and i hope you are treating this as such. but here you go;
other incidences are less egregious but still make me suspicious. when they first rejoined after his long period of absence, they began messaging me, likely recognizing me since i've played for a while. when asked, he did not disclose his identity, which i thought was strange. only much later in the conversation did he reveal himself as w1ze. this may sound like a small incident but this compiled with his self centered reinstatement look familiar to any long time player. my perception is that - like many serial trolls in the past - this player elevates his position as a suspended player to that of a sort of pariah. this player overstates his impact on the community similar to how panther, savnith, or scutix used to. i'm not implicating wboson as a troll or even a bad person; i just find this trait leads many admins to being suspended or worse.
right now tf needs admins who can retain players by interacting with them, which you know is true more than ever redeastwood. you know i was invited to build on wbosons server and i accepted, only to not be allowed to build and be ignored for half an hour - heck, you were there! do you really want to vouch for a guy who ignores players, is self centered, and doesn't deliver on promises as an admin at this point in time?
-
↩ Wize you value my opinion so much you breached your promise of confidentiality in favor of trying to discredit me. i could not possibly object more and i hope other admins will reconsider their own votes instead of blindly vouching without even reading the reinstatement application and basing their vote off of name alone.
"[17:23:32] [Render thread/INFO]: [CHAT] | [Freedom 01] WBoson > [Freedom 01] jwmphall: I'm not going to publish
anything to the forums to prevent drama, but between you and I" -
-
object. don't really trust this player regarding some interaction(s) we had. I have no idea of his capabilities as an admin, but i've seen enough of him in game to know he's not the kind of admin we need right now in my honest opinion.
also his reason for return sounds entirely self centered. the goal of an admin isn't to promote and maintain self image, its to administrate and have good relations with ops.
-
switching to vouch, you didnt freak out when i objected which shows you're more mature than i remember. you may still be a troll but you're just the kind of troll ops can relate to
-
-
@Darth#15179 i know i'm not supposed to reply on this but the permanent ban was the first punishment - forums or in game - that i received. just for the record