Posts by Shdwo

    Object, anyone given access to this feature should be responsible enough to not abuse it. (It also tells you who the last person to edit a post is, if you hover over "Edited")

    May I add, from a non-biased perspective.. I have seen Red increase his behaviour in the last month. I too agree that his aggression was quite severe when it came to getting his point across and other miscellaneous things, however in the last month, I've seen a huge improvement on how he handles things and his behaviour in general.


    In regards to steven's point (which seems to be the main focal point for most of these objections)

    Quote

    you seem to have a rather aggressive attitude towards anyone you believe to be in the wrong.

    This may have been true about a month prior, however as i've lurked over some chats.. Red has majorly improved and his general attitude as a whole is more calm and relaxed, especially to Operators.



    For example, instead of getting aggressive or responding in an inappropriate manner.. Red responded to this criticism in a calm and respectful way.



    As well as here, even when the opposing person criticised in a fairly aggressive and informal way. Red didn't stoop down and approach in the same way.





    In fact, I think Red's the only person I've seen that's actually willing to give feedback on something or someone's attitude, without just insulting them for it. This was a conversation with Ashaz that he had. P.S I had to take snippets as there was server chat in-between all of this


    In my opinion, Red shouldn't be held up for his past. He's clearly shown that he's changed in the last month and that he's willing to take constructive criticism and respond to situations in a professional manner


    His dedication to TF is something to admire too, he's willing to use his own resources, money and time to better player's experience and expand TF as a whole. As proven by the new GMod server.

    onve upon a time, me adn venmo was getting a icecream ant the icceram paralour... WE SAW THE PRESIDENT!! mr kanst was there stod inffront of us, we were GOBSTOPPER SMACKED!!! we ddn't kno what toDO! so.. we dropped our icecreamms allllll over the floor! didn't we venom?? and then the prsident came ove and picke them up and went "you suck you cant hold icecreams" andt ehn me and venom cried!! for the WHOLE NIGHT!!! solo i dont like this president! fjc you!!

    fionnvenom2021

    @Miwojedk#9924 Our main goal regarding the playerbase is to encourage players to not only be present on the GMOD server, but migrate over to the Minecraft server too. There are multiple references to TotalFreedom's existence (as expected) in game, ranging from the loading screens to the join messages. We've also updated our discord, advertising and explaining the move to TF.


    GMOD has a built in server list that displays the most popular and most liked server's first. We aim for the top of this list, as long as we have players on.. other players will join, then more players off of those players e.t.c. Each player will have a direct advertisement that not only leads to TF's MC server IP, but also the discord & forum aswell. Compared to other games/gamemodes, GMOD is fairly easy to gain an active playerbase on.. however this could be proven wrong. Time will only tell.

    Quote

    @Ashaz#9640 However as I also said, we do have evidence to prove you made a head which can crash people and potentially crash the server too.

    Making an item that crashes people isn't against the rules, it's if you use that item to directly cause harm or ill-intent towards the server. I've seen a few crash items made by a player called "EvoIve" that were actually used to create crash chunks and crash the server (not by EvoIve himself however) yet this player joins constantly without expecting punishment in any way.


    vouch for release

    Object. There are multiple worlds in which you can do this (/world (number)) creating more just for the sake of it would be completely pointless and non-beneficial. Redstone like this is allowed as long as it isn't directly/indirectly harming a player's experience, messing with them or their build, or used for malicious intent such as crashing/lagging the server.

    @wild1145#9703 I feel like that is definitely needed if this is going to be implemented. However what would be the point in granting OPs access to vanish when they can just add an invisibility potion to themselves and it would have the same effect? Admins would still be able to see them via /gmsp as a ghosty outline appears when viewing invisible entities.


    And as for building near spawn, drinking an invisiblity potion or even using /effect would have the same outcome as giving them access to vanish. Other people would still be able to see blocks being placed and destroyed, just not the player model itself. You can even hide particles using /effect or potions.


    If we block the ability to disguise as invisible falling blocks or entities, that would eliminate the possibility of hiding from admins (refer to my suggestion: https://forum.totalfreedom.me/…falling-block-entities/21). The only benefit I'd see out of allowing this would be ease of access as they wouldn't have to manually drink a potion or add an effect with a lengthy command.. other than that, it's useless

    @wild1145#9685 @Ashaz#9684 Vanished admins are essentially granted invisibility. Admins can only see other admins (in vanish) on tab, in the actual game they're invisible.. the most you can see is a couple of invisibility particles.


    Example (in this picture, matt is in front of me in vanish):