I Object. You are not active in-game. I have not seen you much so I get the impression you simply want the rank. I'd strongly (once the server is back online) recommend attempting to increase your activity where possible before considering applying.
Posts by Alco_Rs11
-
-
especially after seeing some of the replies regarding Eva's ban appeal
That's a pretty non-compelling reason to add a dislike button. I'm sure there are more compelling reasons but that single thread is not a very good justification for it.
Neutral.
-
I Object.
You were found to be one of the abusers of the fake hostnames thing (and were not found to be wrongly banned after a subsequent review of UUIDs associated) and as such have been rightfully banned for 2 months. Your ban is set to expire on December 9th, 17 days from now so I find it pretty pointless to appeal when the ban is expiring in 3 weeks...
Unfortunately, my ban does not expire in 3 weeks (image atteched below). Also what part is there to abuse? It doesn't cause any disruption to the server nor gameplay.
Indefinite Bans were converted to "Long-Term" bans and as part of the stipulations of your ban, it is set to expire 2 months from its issuance on October 9th, so yes, it is expiring 3 weeks from now.
You still abused an exploit which is still bannable. The exploit in question abused a vulnerability in Plan which clogged it up with bogus data, making legitimate data harder to access, so yes, it did have 'harmful' effects on the server.
You would have been spared from being banned if you reported the vulnerability in Plan but you didn't which is a violation of both the old and new conduct policies so a ban was rightfully issued.
-
It hurts to look at. Anything I use that supports a dark mode is used in dark mode.
-
Bumping for more input.
Personally, I'd rather just let this expire when all the other bans are set to expire.
-
I Object.
You were found to be one of the abusers of the fake hostnames thing (and were not found to be wrongly banned after a subsequent review of UUIDs associated) and as such have been rightfully banned for 2 months. Your ban is set to expire on December 9th, 17 days from now so I find it pretty pointless to appeal when the ban is expiring in 3 weeks...
-
I Object. You should learn your actions have consequences and should serve out the punishment fully.
-
I Vouch. I only support getting rid of the lock after applications were posted and the associated two-week delay. However, I Object to removing the private 2nd vote - The Senior-Level vote should be retained as it permits seniors to discuss matters about a candidate without the worry of being scrutinised or brigaded by OPs trying to influence votes.
-
holy shit i remember you
-
I Vouch. This user has been banned and warned far too many times on basically every platform and still doesn't learn or get the message their behaviour needs re-adjusting.
-
An accounting firm in the metaverse. Unbelievable that isn't satire.
I actually had to look it up to make sure it wasn't a joke and yes, they really do have a presence in that shit. I couldn't believe it either.
-
I Object. Luke's reasoning sums up my decision.
-
I would like to express some concerns I have as constructive criticism. While I haven't been too observational, I have noticed that you have been making excessive amounts of sexual jokes. While I don't expect a team full of young adults to not make sex jokes, there is a limit with those kinds of things.
I've included an example below so you can understand what I mean by this.
The brakes definitely need to be applied on making these remarks.
I Object. You continue to make these remarks and it is quite disturbing and you then got banned for it.
-
One of the mods is for an older version of Minecraft, v1.18.1 when it seems you're running on 1.18.2. That might be contributing to your problems. I also recommend checking to see if the mods are for forge or fabric. Some are obvious and include "forge" in the name so you know it's for forge.
And there's another that is made for 1.18 which is two versions behind 1.18.2
Check all the mod versions to make sure they're compatible with 1.18.2 and load them one by one into your mods folder until you get errors and you'll know which ones are causing problems.
-
I Vouch.
Beacons on their own (without being activated) really aren't that big of an issue.
Compare the two images in the spoiler below. The first one has no 25-radius beacon sphere and I get over 200 FPS. As soon as I generate the sphere my FPS ranges from 0 to 5 at most. This is not a case of a "shit GPU" since I have a higher-end RTX 30-series card. There are absolutely 0 compelling reasons other than to lag clients that people should be able to WorldEdit beacons. Immediately after removing the sphere, my FPS recovered.
-
(who's brilliant idea was it to allow people to load in schematics from remote sources???)
just quickly that could be changed when we ever switch to a diffrent way of doing permissions cause you can just block that command
The exploit is through the schematic loading command and blocking //schem load won't go down very well with the community.
-
I Object.
I do not think we should be forcing people to use a resource pack just so that they can use this plugin. It also seems this plugin relies on falling block entities (which likely rely on block gravity) to work right so we'd have to enable a major lag source for this to work right. Without block gravity enabled none of the cool animations display. I also wonder if /rd will conflict with the plugin while someone is opening a door since it uses what appear to be falling blocks.
-
A full error stacktrace would also be useful since it'd aid in pinpointing which mods were causing issues alongside the list of mods & their versions.
-
alright when is this shitshow being explained thanks
-
holy shit.
