Honestly, freedom-01 and anarchy-01 sound like a good combo, the first one being for players who want a more laid back experience and the second one being for the generic 2b2t sweatlords
e: Weekly or biweekly resets for the anarchy-01 server would be a good edition, as to keep the gameplay fresh and the world size low
↩ @'Ryan' I can usually tell whether I'm dreaming or not because I usually have a bf in my dreams
Quote↩ Xen Honestly, the anarchy idea was great other than the hardcore aspect. Many people suggested just unbanning everyone and continuing anarchy, but you scrapped the whole thing because you saw it as a failure because no one played on the server. The reality is, everyone was banned and no one COULD play on the server.
Survivability bias at work
But to add on to this, it would be nice if it didn't permanently ban you for dying, more like it would just ban you for five minutes before you could respawn. That was the main reason I didn't try playing due to dying for some bs reason while escaping spawn and not being able to enjoy it.
↩ Allink Except the respawn sequence isn't tied to any specific event and can't be cancelled (conventionally, maybe scissors can do something about that), and it'll still rebuild the pillars which'll grief anything in their way. I'd prefer a more elegant solution, but the WG one is the easiest patch for it I can think of atm
Oh fuck wait you meant something else
If a two-factor system is that necessary, it should function as a bot that sends a verification message on discord with a button component, and if you click it it'll verify you.
As to prevent end crystals from being placed on the portal to start the respawn sequence (which can cause irreversible damage)
↩ videogamesm12 Are you going to sell hard copies of this report?
Quote↩ RedEastWood I like keeping the role being called mentally unstable it’s much more relaxed and if ur playing on the server that much you probably don’t care about what the role is called and you joke around with the community
Even if it's a joke, I don't think it fits all that well into a server which is actively trying to garner a larger player-base, what with the hub / networkmanager redux / etc. Maybe it's not that big of a deal, maybe I'm overreacting or whatever, but It's just how I feel about it.
↩ @'frontinside' It's not really what I'd call a professional name for a role which rewards playtime (mostly due to the ableist undertone to it). Maybe "Regulars" would be more fitting?
Please change the name of this role soon
Vouched and couched vouch or I'll throw a couch through your house
Has taken time out of her day to proofread threads I'm about to post so I appreciate that
I think a more "official" name than mentally unstable should probably be considered in the future. Idk if it's just my problem, but I always kinda saw it as offensive.
Kendrick lamar is incapable of falling off
