Posts by videogamesm12

Here's what my main computer's desktop looks like:

Quote from Paldiu

[...] manipulating NBT data beyond the allowed scope [...]. We've already circumvented this by taking away a large portion of these privileges

I'm not sure I agree with revoking the ability to mess around with NBT. Frankly, I believe this will harm the community more than it will help it because a large portion of this community focuses on the idea of custom or unique items, usually created by messing around with NBT beyond what is normally possibly within the limits of the game.

Quote from Paldiu

This will ideally prevent things like the armor stand bugs, the sign bugs, the item frame bugs, the painting bugs, the entity nbt bugs, etc...

You see, that's what makes TF so unique though. The unrestricted ability to mess around with items to do things that were never intended by Mojang and would have been blocked by other servers is one of the things that makes TF feel more free than a generic creative server. I don't think it's wise to take away this freedom to push Minecraft to its limits.

Quote from Paldiu

Here's an explanation of why we need to wipe flatlands for 1.19.3 and why the world sizes increased: With 1.19, Mojang introduced a negative y value for their world generation. First, let's imagine how java processes an integer. Integers by default can take up to 32 bits of space. We can divide this into 8 numbers, appearing as such: 0000 0000 0000 0000. The number 1, for example, is 0000 0000 0000 0001. This can be stored negligibly as 1 bit as it only needs the 1, as all the prefixed 0s are unneeded. Through something called the Most Significant Bit (MSB), we determine how much storage is necessary to store that particular value. With the number 1, our most significant bit is 1. This means we can store a that number as a singular bit in our storage files. However, when you introduce the negative number, our MSB changes. -1 is represented as 1000 0000 0000 0001. This means our MSB is the first 1 in the sequence, which means we need to store all the bits to memory.

Now, in the context of our world files, this means that for every single y increment of -1 that the world generates, it stores the 32 bits of data in comparison to its minimum. Across thousands of chunks with around 25 million blocks squared across the map (might be larger, either way not good), not including our Y coordinate, this is exponentially larger than previously where integers were strictly positive. This means that world sizes nearly double due to the new Y value rules, and this causes major issues especially with larger world files. For comparison, our flatlands file is around 300GB. If we update to 1.19, it will increase to about 534GB. The total amount of storage space all of the worlds occupy is about 580 gb, currently. If we update without wiping, this will increase to over 1TB of space, which is absolutely outrageous.

TL;DR: If we were to upgrade to 1.19.3 with the current worlds we have now, the size of the worlds would grow to a point where it would be beyond our control due to the differences in how Minecraft stores world data in 1.18+.

Good for you

This is what my desktop looks on my Linux laptop:

No

You've toned down the sexual shit, but in its place a few concerning factors have come up.

• You have an unhealthy attachment to TF. Like, worse than me. I worry that you becoming an admin would only further this unhealthy attachment to the server, to the point that it could genuinely impact your real life.
• You practice bad OPSEC. You have repeatedly doxed yourself to the public by recklessly posting your address and name, not understanding the ramifications of doing so. Those bits of information should never be public (and could be leveraged against you as a staff member by disgruntled players to do unthinkable things like sending a fucking SWAT team to your house). I worry that this habit of yours could lead to you recklessly leaking admin-related information in a similar fashion.

Object.

Hotbars+ is a mod I created a few years ago that massively expands your saved hotbar capacity to an almost ludicrous degree. Ever since then, the mod has exploded in popularity with item communities, including TF's. Over the past few months, I've been repeatedly asked to put Hotbars+ onto platforms like CurseForge and Modrinth. I'm pleased to announce that Hotbars+ is now on Modrinth and CurseForge.

Here are the page links:

• Modrinth: https://modrinth.com/mod/hotbars%2B
• CurseForge: https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/hotbarsplus

P.S. The latest version of the mod is currently v2.0-pre9.

Wordle 621 6/6

⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛

⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛

⬛⬛🟨⬛🟩

⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩

🟩⬛🟩🟨🟩

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

The UYScutix Revolution was a campaign against the server's administration over the course of the 2017 in a bid for more democracy, the removal of a developer, and ultimately control over the server. It was led primarily by UYScutix/Vj13573, a former Senior Admin who grew sick of the server's administration and had such bad blood with Mark and other developers that it ultimately resulted in his indefinite suspension and ban from the server. The movement severely divided the admin team as many chose between supporting his cause and supporting his rival, Marco. Its collapse, which was caused by a group of three people (including one who really liked poems), led to one of the biggest suspension waves in the server's history.

Chapter 1 - Background

The revolution's roots began in early 2016 as a combination of multiple factors: community-wide resentment towards a certain administrator, unrest with management at the time, an increasingly problematic American former staff member, and an unstable British former staff member.

That "certain administrator" was an Italian player named marcocorriero11 (or Marco for short). He became an admin on January 1, 2016 through the TPaS program. To say that Marco was a controversial staff member among his peers would be an incredible understatement. He was vigorously criticized for using macros to administrate, having fully-fledged bots that almost fully automated his administrative duties, having an inflated ego, repeatedly violating the Identity Policy, or otherwise acting like an ass. Some even felt that he was being protected by Mark himself, and this wasn't without merit. Over the course of 2016 and the first half of 2017, there were four attempts vote Marco off and despite the vast majority of people voting in favor of removing him, none of the vote-offs were successful. One even resulted in VJ (who had created it) being suspended temporarily. Mark refused to remove him despite his flaws and repeatedly defended him every step of the way.

Unrest with management became more prevalent in late 2016, notably (from my memory at least) after Mark attempted to introduce the OPWatch program, which intended to give operators (including former admins) a special secret security-related rank that only Mark and a select few executives knew about. The program was hugely unpopular. Furthermore, many didn't like how Mark would dismiss public criticisms as "nasty drama", which only furthered the growing resentment towards Mark at the time. All of this culminated with multiple staff members resigning in protest. Mark responded by forum banning several who he said were "causing drama" for at least a week. He also instructed the remaining staff members to ban them from the server as well.

If you weren't able to tell, these two are interlinked. People didn't like Marco because they felt he was fucking around too much, and they didn't like Mark because they felt he was tyrannical or defended Marco despite what a good chunk of staff members felt about him.

Savnith was a former staff member with an increasingly problematic history. Many knew him to work like clockwork, as he'd apologize for his actions, then regain everyone's trust, then completely shatter it by doing something stupid. Over time, people really started to get sick of his shit, and eventually he had to resort to returning under new identities in order to keep playing on the server. He became increasingly problematic in 2017, collecting people's IP addresses from insiders and building a shitlist of sorts.

VJ was a British staff member with an unstable history. At the peak of his career, he was a Senior Admin. After resigning sometime in early 2015 (allegedly due to disputes with other staff members), he went on to attack the server and its staff members with a group of rogue staff members named DDOXYZ. In a lot of ways, he was like Savnith: constantly getting himself into trouble and then begging for more chances. After several failed attempts to return to the server under various identities, he decided come back to the server one more time in late 2016 as UYScutix.

Chapter 2 - Rodeo with Mark

Obsessed with being strict on authoritarian-levels, VJ frequently objected on people's admin applications with lengthy over-dramatic essays for reasons. As you can imagine, this was incredibly obnoxious for many staff members. The straw that broke the camel's back was his vote on an admin application by Savnith, which prompted many staff members to complain to Mark, who then sent a private message to VJ about it on February 18, 2017. To try to curb his behavior, Mark essentially banned him from providing reasoning in his votes on admin applications for the rest of the month.

VJ, noticeably offended by this, furiously replied about 30 minutes later, defending himself by noting that Savnith had way more chances than necessary, ranting about how easy it was for people to get admin on the server, and ultimately shifting responsibility onto someone else.

Things were getting heated quickly, and Mark tried to diffuse the situation with his next reply by suggesting that if VJ disagrees with him, then he can just leave. Mark also pointed out that Savnith had already screwed his new identity over, so either way he wouldn't have become an admin. Not like it would have mattered, since he also pointed out that the issue is about VJ, not Savnith. This wasn't their first rodeo by a long shot, but Mark didn't want another. So, he issued an ultimatum: cut the shit and stand down or get removed.

It didn't work. VJ continued to insist that Savnith and Mark were the ones in the wrong and proceeded to complain about the imbalance of quality admins vs. the quantity of admins and the decline in the server's reputation. He went with the latter option, repeating his argument about how Savnith had been given so many chances and thus cannot be trusted.

This seemed to really piss Mark off, because his next response had an unusually pissed off tone. He argued that the whole point of the identity policy was to prevent rogues like Savnith from getting the admin rank back (which wasn't followed anyways) and that VJ was part of the problem with TF's reputation because he was making public scenes with his complaints instead of keeping them private. He concluded the reply by giving him one last chance to turn back and telling him to "stop writing stump speeches and books".

VJ still didn't back down. He argued that complaints were being ignored and that it was easy to become admin but hard to get suspended. He challenged Mark to remove him, even after being told the ramifications that followed. He argued he wasn't appreciated as admins and that people like him and Galahad are always working hard to enforce the server rules and have memorized them by heart. Funny.

Mark gave VJ a way out of the situation, stating that if he wants to help then he should cut the shit with the drama and respect all admins. VJ, changing his mind, finally gave in to Mark's terms. Mark then concluded the PM.

Later that day, VJ conversed with me on Steam about the situation and forwarded me the PM. I do not have those chat logs anymore, unfortunately.

Chapter 3 - The Vote-Off

Resentment towards Marco peaked on May 18, 2017, when VJ created a vote-off against him without consulting with executives and Mark himself (a violation of the policy). Despite the illegitimacy of the vote-off, however, several staff members (current and former) began to hurl hateful abuse at Marco shortly afterwards in-game, repeatedly insulting and attacking him by calling him a shit programmer and all that. The abuse got to the point where he legitimately broke down in the chat.

[17:03:30] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [ADMIN] marcocorriero [STA]: feeling sad and on tears now, because i we tought we are family, all friendly and each other acc
[17:03:43] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [ADMIN] marcocorriero [STA]: accepted each others , and no matters how.
[17:03:54] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [ADMIN] marcocorriero [STA]: no, i dont want to fight again.

When Mark found out about the thread and how Marco was treated, he was not happy. He deleted the thread, temporarily removed VJ from his staff position to get his attention, and sent a private message to multiple staff members who were critical of Marco asking why he shouldn't be a developer. I took the opportunity to give my opinion, and Mark seemed to appreciate it, but noted that Marco took initiative to help the server and explained why he finds that important.

In more internal channels, he created a thread that detailed exactly why VJ was temporarily removed.

Quote from markbyron

uyscutix absurdly initiated a vote-off outside of the policy - totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/24940/vote-off-admin-policy-aug - i consider uyscutix a constant disruptive force who doesn't practice what he harshly demands of others; I have repeatedly warned him. I temporarily removed him to get his attention. If you have a problem a with a particular admin, handle it properly instead of grinding your personal axe.

I urge you to please follow the admin disciplinary process. totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/2046/admin-disciplinary-process

The goal should be to solve problems at the lowest level and before they get out of hand. Unfortunately I think some rather enjoy the public drama.

The removal itself created a lot of dissent. When the thread was still active, a large majority of people voted to have him removed, so when the vote-off was completely erased and the person behind it was removed, it was viewed by many as complete bullshit and yet another example of Mark defending Marco as much as possible. A few hours after the thread was removed, staff member xRubyMC created a group PM consisting of multiple staff members critical of Marco to discuss it. Many of the people in the PM did not agree with the idea of the group, viewing it as largely unnecessary and potentially disastrous.

User	Message
xRubyMC	Hello. I created this PM because of marco is not getting any removals from the voteoff just because mark is being a bullshit on protecting marco. We need your reply on how will this end. Me and scutix were having a conversation on why marco won't get any removals. You guys also don't trust marco because of his "coding" skills. Scutix even got suspended because of his "democracy" opinion. Once his forum account is unbanned, he will explain why his opinion got rejected by mark; because marco, he helped mark to do things. He can't even do codes but he even asked Commo to do it since he knows how to code. I'll need anyone to have a long-ass paragraph post if you have anything that have with marco-related. Have any means that you only got. We'll be having a discussion to this only with Anti-Marco admins who doesn't like marco. Hope you understand.
JJ_Jaguar2000	There was no need at all to create a group chat with like 20 admins. Because this will be disastrous. It will end up being like a Marco hate group. Which is not what we want.
xRubyMC	I know, we were having a plan to pm many admins that don't even trust marco. We all know you voted him to remove him.
xRubyMC	Even though, it's more of an issue regarding everyone's votes being blatantly ignored.
JJ_Jaguar2000	Ok. Let me explain. Last night I got carried away a bit. To me I don't really see that many issues with Marco TBH. He may be trying to code something good, or trying to be helpful but it's just not working. I have no idea why I even thought of a voteoff TBH.

However, there were some people who agreed with the idea and felt that Mark was censoring the majority's opinion, biased, or was trying to cover for Marco in some way.

One staff member, MrPerson660, expressed concerns about the nature of this group. He argued it was going too far and that it was looking lot like a "retarded vigilante group" which "ended up backfiring onto its creators" and sternly warned that it would do nothing but cause more trouble. A brutal example of foreshadowing for what would happen in the future.

Quote from MrPerson660

Ok, I don't like Marco as much as everyone else but this group chat is too far.

This is looking a lot like that retarded vigilante group a few years ago that ended up backfiring onto the creators. This will do nothing except cause more trouble.

Ruby ultimately caved in, instructing people who want to leave to do so, expressing concern that there might be spies forwarding the group to Mark, and noting that Mark had already warned him not to cause drama on the forums in regards to Marco.

Quote from xRubyMC

if you want to leave this conversation, please do. dont want any spies to send and mark already warned me not to make any marco drama related.

bye now

It would seem that Ruby was right to be concerned about spies, because Mark found out about the PM pretty soon afterwards. Clearly frustrated, he asked a select few from the group to be honest with him and give input for how the situation could be resolved. He stressed that while Marco isn't perfect, the person who tried to vote him off is much worse by comparison. After receiving some input from SupItsDillon, Mark made a proposal: give Ruby, VJ, and Marco a 1 week break from the server in an attempt to cool the situation down. Dillon seemed to agree with idea, and Mark put it into place a few minutes later.

In the official announcement about the breaks, Mark didn't give much detail about the situation in question but did stress that the break was not a sanction but was instead a "cool down".

Quote from markbyron

Three admins will take a short break from the server (Uy, Ruby, Marco) - let's call it cool down and not a sanction or blame game - more like a vacation to let things chill.

Mark clearly wanted to settle the situation once and for all with this solution, but unfortunately for him, it was only just the beginning.

Chapter 4 - The Permanent Ban

The solution Mark tried didn't work out as planned. Him and VJ had yet another rodeo in PMs, and it got pretty heated. In a Skype group with KM_Galahad and DarkLynx108, VJ angrily explained what was happening and expressed a desire for a revolution. Whatever the argument entailed, it must have been spicy because it ended with Mark banning him from the forums.

Lynx defended Marco's unban from the server, explaining that a change in policy took place which actually properly acknowledges the developers as actual developers. VJ argued that the "new developers" didn't deserve their ranks, reiterated his wishes for a revolution to take place, and once again painted Mark as a tyrant who doesn't listen to anyone's feedback and bans those who question him.

User	Message
DarkLynx108	Quote from UYScutix Marco is a DEVELOPER?! and he's also released from perm ban -_- because of this http://totalfreedom.boards.net…min-important-admins-read
DarkLynx108	he basically made it so that developers are actually acknowledged as developers now
UYScutix	tbh none of the new developers deserved their rank
UYScutix	that Commodore guy wasn't really good either
UYScutix	but Marco was the worst since marco's plan is to make everything run his way, with his plugins, that no one likes.
UYScutix	That's it. I'm seriously done with this server.
UYScutix	We seriously need to begin a revolution on TF, for real this time.
UYScutix	Paldiu was right
DarkLynx108	I mean I don't see how showing the developer's as the dev rank is a bad thing tbh
DarkLynx108	Marco has been a dev you know
UYScutix	not that-
UYScutix	I mean
UYScutix	So mark forum banned me again after I questioned him.
UYScutix	and this is also the reason why mark trusts marco. Because they both share something stupid in common with them.
UYScutix	marco always bickers when someone corrects him; he thinks he is always perfect.
UYScutix	and not everyone is perfect
UYScutix	it's the same with mark- he thinks he is always right

VJ then elaborated further on the rodeo he had with Mark. Painting himself as the victim of a tyrant, he implied that he was being silenced by Mark for speaking the truth. He even argued that he wasn't out of line, despite wanting to start a revolution against the owner of a block game server.

VJ then goes on to ramble about how the server's various issues and complained about the lack of a democracy and describes how vote-offs would work under his leadership.

Mark ended up permanently banning VJ from the entire server the next day. In the thread which announced the ban, Mark details his frustrations with VJ and his behavior before concluding the thread by saying "this is game server, not a military camp". The wording in the thread implies that Mark just said "fuck it" and banned VJ from the server.

Quote from markbyron

uyscutix (formerly VJ who was also perm banned) is no longer welcome on Total Freedom. I'll simply ref totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/51860/server-hours-owner-break-back and he just wanted to argue with me and accuse others of what he himself is doing. I had hoped the new incarnation of VJ as Uyscutix would be better and he was for a time but as he progressed up the ranks, he reverted and so if he wants to return, he'll have to try again from scratch with a new identity. Maybe it would be better for him to run and own his server because that's what he really wants - to own it. This is a game server not a military camp; you can't be a hard-case with double-standards and hope to successful here; at least not with me.

Of course, VJ caught word very quickly after Lynx notified him about the thread's existence while he was ranting about the ban. Naturally curious, he asked for details about the thread (where it was, its contents, etc).

VJ then began to give his commentary on the post itself, claiming that Mark was exaggurating what he was doing (even though that's literally what he himself was doing) and once again reiterated his wishes for a revolution.

User	Message
UYScutix	Quote from markbyron This is a game server not a military camp I knew he'd say that
UYScutix	Always an excuse to be a repetitive warning machine
UYScutix	He keeps exaggerating everything I say
UYScutix	"Quality > Quantity", starts saying this is not a business establishment.
DarkLynx108	I see
UYScutix	Of course we know that- he takes it to his head and assumes I expect apps to be hard as applying for a Job
UYScutix	not THAT hard.
UYScutix	Just reduce quantity
UYScutix	I'm done with this place
UYScutix	Quote Maybe it would be better for him to run and own his server and yes- I will do that
UYScutix	it's going to be a lot better than this god awful server
UYScutix	could you screenshot it? Sometimes I just like to look at the post as well as just reading the quote ;p
UYScutix	idk why- for some reason I like seeing the post outline
DarkLynx108
UYScutix	thanks
UYScutix	all those admins liking the post...
UYScutix	I find it immature- although that's always been the case; even 3-4 years ago when the server was better
UYScutix	who else was liking the post
UYScutix	That's it- I think it's time to begin a revolution.
UYScutix	lol someone I said this to said if I begin a revolution, it will increase the chance of mark quitting.

In a Discord conversation with a user named Kookie, VJ discussed what happened from his point of view, explained why he felt it was bullshit, and reiterated that he wanted a revolution. He directly mentioned that he had another rodeo with Mark and even includes an excerpt from one of the replies he made in the PM.

User	Message
UYScutix	Alright. bad news
UYScutix	a lot of BS rn on tf
UYScutix	Marco is now officially a developer (developer rank on forum, i.e. purple name)
UYScutix	he got released from perm ban
Kookie	tf
Kookie	he asked me a favor to return on tf. im not going to there anymore
Kookie	looks like u have to use a new identity
UYScutix	who showed you that screenshot
UYScutix	it's in the admin lounge
Kookie	i got unbanned lol
UYScutix	We need to begin a revolution on TF- this is a joke. He's using "this isn't a military camp" as an excuse to just let blatant trolls stay
Kookie	you're permbanned tho
UYScutix	yeah
UYScutix	I'll tell you what happened
UYScutix	I was actually unbanned on the forum yesterday
Kookie	and you caused a ruckus again?
Kookie	or you actually wanted to have an opinion on mark?
UYScutix	but as Typh and Reflet said, mark relies on censorship. He then re-banned me because I was telling the truth lmao
UYScutix	I had an opinion
Kookie	lmao
UYScutix	and he thinks I am "arguing"
Kookie	i made a long-ass paragraph on the warning pm lmao
UYScutix	Also, when he sent me the PM about "you have no right to initiate a voteoff", I replied "Why? You yourself broke the policy, yet you come up to me and say I don't have the right to voteoff. Why do you even have a voteoff policy if you yourself don't even follow it?"
Kookie	sec. im replying to mark atm
UYScutix	let me know what you say - and let me know what mark says 😉
UYScutix	people aren't allowed to have opinions in his world - he expects people like us to keep quiet because he doesn't want the truth to be revealed

Following this, Kookie posted multiple screenshots of his argument with Mark, though none of the images were linked in the export. VJ's response does paint a very vague picture about what the argument was like. The conversation ended very shortly afterwards.

User	Message
UYScutix	I like how even when you expressed your feelings friendly, mark still showed hostility and saying at the end "If not, take your leave"
Kookie	ya. hes so strict now. in the past, he was kind
UYScutix	he's not strict
UYScutix	well he is but in the wrong way
Kookie	the server changed so much
UYScutix	ikr

Shortly after this conversation ended, Pramire (then known as Ivengix) created a thread in the Telnet Clan Lounge expressing concerns that some of the admins on TotalFreedom were celebrating its possible shutdown on UnraveledMC, an associated server with a rapidly deteriorating relationship that harbored many former staff members and players who were suspended, banned, or otherwise disillusioned with the way Mark ran the place.

Quote from Pramire

Noticed some TF admins (that are UMC admins too) celebrating that TF may be discontinued.

Mark responded by moving the thread to a much more internal board, removing and banning two staff members (Rylie and Robin) and revoking the associated status of UnraveledMC. VJ noticed the new entries in the permanent ban list (as the list was publicly available for everyone at the time) and was understandably confused, so he asked around to try to figure out what happened. He got his answer pretty quickly.

As you would expect, VJ used the situation to further his agenda that Mark was a tryannical dictator, but was interrupted by Lynx to clarify the situation.

Mark created a thread in the Super Admin Lounge a few hours later formally announcing his decision and stating that advertising UnraveledMC is not allowed on the forums nor server.

Quote from markbyron

The following admins are removed and banned until 1 July: rylie. & ?Robin.

I'm also removing UMC from associated server status until at least 1 July and will have to re-apply after that date if they wish to be associated again. This was done based on evidence that provided on the Telnet Clan forum - I won't re-print it here although I'm sure it's been around. I've always supported associated servers and encourage them but when they're used against TF, to sew TF admin unrest, to undermine TF, or to profit from our loss, they don't need to be associated. Associated servers should support each and not work against each other. UMC can now do what they wish however if you're an admin on that server and use it to cause trouble for TF, bash TF/TF admins or admit to engaging in misconduct on TF, make sure nobody is gong to pass that information to me or here. Once it's posted here or given to me, than you're subject to admin rules of respect & conduct here. Again, if you can't stomach how I do business here or you think most of the admins are bad or too many, etc., just leave in peace and go to an associated server or unaffiliated server or somewhere else and have enough respect not to cause any problems for TF. The same holds true for associated servers; if you don't like them, don't cause problems for them. I know people must think it's easy & great to be a server owner but it's far from easy and I respect other server owners - I hope they can respect me. Also, UMC may not be advertised here or on the server.

Within an hour, VJ restarted the conversation he had with Kookie to briefly discuss it.

Wordle 620 3/6

⬛⬛⬛🟨🟨

🟨⬛⬛⬛🟩

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

I've been in your shoes before, and a situation like yours is very difficult to get out of. I genuinely don't think you intended to harm the server. However, regardless of your intentions, what you did ended up shattering any form of trust I have in you as a staff member. With that being said, I am comfortable enough to allow you back as a player only. You will not be able to reinstate as a staff member, and you will have to reapply from scratch with explicit approval from the Executive Admin Officer and myself.

Vouch, but only for the above conditions.

If you have a shitload of time to spare, why not go Google dorking? Simply take your IP address, replace the last two numbers with the star symbol, then add a "site:" at the beginning of the IP (for example, "site:179.28.*.*"), then hit enter.

If you're lucky, you can sometimes find some cool shit like people's printers, security cameras, power controllers, radio receivers, or even messages from understandably pissed off webmasters. If you don't find anything interesting, just increment/decrement one of the numbers in the IP address range.

Just don't fuck with other people's shit.

NewPipe is my go-to YouTube app for Android. It's free and open source and has many perks over the official YouTube app from Google: https://github.com/TeamNewPipe/NewPipe

Here's a list of cool shit it lets you do free of cost:

• Listen to videos in the background
• Store playlists locally (without needing a Google account)
• Download videos
• Watch videos without getting swarmed with ads
• Import playlists and subscriptions from Google Takeout exports

It also has support for other platforms aside from YouTube like SoundCloud. No account needed to use any of the app's features.

Who is the most racist person on this server?

Quote from Miwojedk

"American"
"You guys"
"Trigger warning" (lol)
"White paper"

Holy shit HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Telesphoreo brought a really interesting document taken from a Standford University page to my attention earlier today. Titled "Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative", I think you know what we're getting into from reading this joke of a document. Essentially, it tries to get you to stop using certain words/phrases because of the words' histories, even if they have nothing to do with what the word is used for now. Literally textbook woke culture.

The entire document is full of goodies, like these for example:

Here's the full document: https://s.wsj.net/public/resou…ents/stanfordlanguage.pdf

What a joke.

Does anybody remember the days of like MSN where you could freely theme your client, use custom emojis, play shit like tic-tac-toe, save your conversations, and more without needing to pay for some subscription service?

Here's a second poll, if someone randomly teleports to a player who happened to be near NSFW content of some kind but said nothing about their location and where they are at, who should be at fault?

NSFW content (such as builds, pixel art, or map art) has become a controversial topic as of recently and people have been complaining about its inconsistent moderation. To hopefully correct this, I've decided to make a poll and help come to a consensus for how this content should be moderated.

When voting in this poll, keep this in mind:

1. This server's demographic mainly consists of people under the age of 18 and exposing them to such content could have major consequences
2. We recently had to crack down on NSFW discussions on the Discord server significantly due to a combination of factors that all came together at once due to leniency (see the #LetsCureCancerAgain movement)
3. When you click on the "Multiplayer" option in the Main Menu for the first time, you will get a warning that experiences online are not rated. This means we should not be expected to be family-friendly
4. Some believe we should not babysit our community because then it could snowball into other restrictions

It's in your best interest to explain your vote as well. Make your choice.

Quote from Deauthorized

Quote from wild1145

It's not a matter of efficiency (or wasn't before) the issue was just the volume... I don't know how it'll react now we've moved to SQLite instead of a remote SQL Server, but I don't think this is really that valuable in the grand scheme of things myself.

Idk if you've ever used /ins, but it's incredibly watered down to the point where anything outside of blocks being removed or placed is useless for it, since everything is mushed under a 'interacted with" log. The /co i command is infinitely more useful than /ins.

The next update to the TotalFreedomMod completely overhauls the Block Inspector and properly fixes the "interacted with" bug in the process.