Posts by videogamesm12

↩  Luke It would if they got chunkbanned by the dickhead.

↩  Ivan Prove they don't.

↩  lyicx Near wouldn't do you any good if a vanished dickhead creates a chunkban.

↩  Luke Because if some vanished dickhead flies around spamming troll potions on people when there are no admins online, players would be unable to report them.

In my fork, I have successfully overhauled /vanish to make it possible for operators to use the command. However, I need more information about how it should be implemented for operators. There are 3 ways this can go down from my perspective:

• None
  OP Vanish would not be implemented. While the many changes I did would still be present, /vanish would remain admins-only.

• Partial
  Players who aren't admin would disappear from the tab list for non-admins and wouldn't be visible, however players will still be able to verify that they are on the server using commands like /list, /whohas, and more. Fake leave and join messages are not included for non-admins. This would allow some degree of privacy, however it would allow for anyone who is griefing and/or being an overall dickhead to be identified.

• Full
  Players would disappear completely from non-admins' sights. It wouldn't be possible to verify whether or not someone is on the server. While this option provides the most privacy, it makes reporting vanished griefers extremely difficult if not impossible. It also means that the player count would appear to be lower than it actually is, which may be harmful to player retention.

Choose wisely.

Oh boy! Now advertisers can identify me even when I'm wearing a mask to target me with their invasive as fuck advertisements!

↩  burger This isn't the first time something like this happened.

↩  Deauthorized A cleaner and more easily hookable event would be to use custom Bukkit events to be honest. That way, more than one plugin can utilize it.

Quote

↩  root simplest way would be to just use remote desktop for this

Remote Desktop applications tend to not play very well with the way Minecraft hooks into the mouse from what I've noticed.

↩  Fleek getPlayer() in PlayerTeleportEvent is for the person being teleported, not the person being teleported to.

↩  batchest The logs would be in .minecraft/logs/. You can send them to me on Discord.

I would like to make an offer. If you can provide me with client-side logs from the time period you were originally banned, I can look through them to see if there is anything that would prove your innocence. Is this something we can arrange?

↩  batchest Yes, I would think so without context. They look suspicious as fuck without it.

↩  batchest Yeah, let me know the next time the plugin somehow "malfunctions" and kicks people for reasons like "testing not allowed! Error!" and "Flying is not enabled on this server!", naming the person who kicked them in the process.

Quote

↩  Flobbier I personally believe that the hacks which he had on did something without him knowing. Disagree with me but this is the only logical explanation considering his firm take that he didnt do anything wrong

How the fuck would a hacked client know to abuse very specific commands in NetworkManager?

↩  Ivan In the wise words of StevenNL2000:

Quote

It is completely understandable that I trigger intimate thoughts with you, but I think you could have chosen a better way to come out.

↩  Ivan I'm not interested in dating anyways so I don't really care.

Set up a Geyser proxy, hook it into any server, and then join it using the Bedrock edition.

↩  Deauthorized PlayerTeleportEvent doesn't provide the UUID of the entity you are teleporting to. This means that you have to do some weird ass workaround to get the UUID yourself.