Quote@Luke#4789 why else would i be senior
nobody here cares that you are senior
you have no respect here
Quote@Luke#4789 why else would i be senior
nobody here cares that you are senior
you have no respect here
Hello! We have been busy at UltraRedFreedom, trying to enhance our players' experience as much as possible!
As always, we are constantly finding ways to improve our server. Therefor, it is with great pleasure that I would like to introduce our Hub and SMP server!
URF now has its very own hub, which is bungeed to our FreeOP and SMP servers. Each server functions individually, so we can guarantee minimal lag on all our platforms.
Join today at ultraredfreedom.com!
We have now got our very own website! Check it out at ultraredfreedom.com
We have completely redone our forums, and now use Invision Communites! Visit our forums at forums.ultraredfreedom.com
We're glad to announce that we are now hosted on a VPS! We use pterodactyl, and have enough RAM and vCores to guarantee minimal lag and solid tps.
We have completed phase one of our TFM ravamp, which includes
Join now using the IP ultraredfreedom.com!
@Luke#4560
Quote@zeseryu#4559 Note, this does not prohibit advertisements such as these [https://forum.totalfreedom.me/t/associated-communities]
haha fuck you
anyways yes I object
Quote@StevenNL2000#4467 I'm not sure why I got banned from the forum
What in the bullshit is this
Quote@Ashaz#4464 Would you be worried? Worried about the fact that some investigation is going on? Worried about the fact that you’re on your own and this group is apparently ‘investigating’ into you?
Not a minecraft freedom server, no
I think what simplynick is trying to say is, according to TF rules, he is unable to impose any punishments unless the perpetrator has actually broken rules. Which in this case he claims they haven’t. I agree with this. If we start banning people for "bullying", then this is hardly a freedom server at all.
If You! can find proof of specific rules (from the conduct policy) being broken, it would probably aid this ordeal.
I'm sorry what exactly do you want us to do here. Tell off Neeaat?
Quote@simplynick#4227 Object, most admins do not check the /report (While offline) and if we do, its probably too late
Me and James regularly check /report. We also respond very quickly.
Perhaps player conduct reports shouldn't be removed, but rather the whole process be more streamlined.
Neutral
Quote@simplynick#4160 Movecraft
@simplynick#4160 FAWE
These two clash.
Looks great! Can I make this adminworld for URF, or is there a policy against that?
Please keep your reactions short and concise. I'll start.
oh shit oh fuck oh what the shit fuck dick
Quote@wild1145#3855 If you can propose how you would re-word the policy, because right now Executives are a key aspect to the ownership policy, and to just exclude them ultimately means the policy can therefore never be invoked.
Any admin can start a vote-off at any time. Executives cannot vote on this, but all other admins can. The votes will be tallied and a conclusion will be drawn accordingly.
Based on recent changes, executives are now appointed by Wild. Wild has mentioned that he wanted the executives to feel safer in their role, so as to not be worried about a vote-off. He has also suggested that the current executives will not be changed for a while. If the time comes for any one of us to initiate an owner vote-off, the executives will be the ones who vote.
I think this is textbook corruption, Wild has just said that he will appoint the executives, and only the executives have the power to remove Wild.
It is for this reason I'd like to exclude executives from an owner vote-off, and limit it to admins who aren't executives.
Can't wait till random atlas employee number 12 is a new executive.
Yes because you should trust fucking Quintoss99 to tell you the rules rather than an admin.
The majority, if not all, of the people on this forum hate you.