@fssp#1966 So from all of this, it still stands that Ashaz is unable to swear on something casually as it is frowned upon, and also unable to swear (take an oath) as he is not a "sane individual" yet.
Boiling down your long post the only new information you've added is that the application doesn't call for any oath on anyone - however that is your interpretation of the word "swear". Personally, I would take that as a casual oath (something which is frowned upon in Islam). So it is perfectly fine for Ashaz to not want to swear. Instead they have promised, and according to what you've said, a promise should be sufficient. Your issue was that they didn't "swear" and you think they made a "joke about god", which simply isn't true.
Quote
@fssp#1968 Neither a religious oath nor the act of swearing to/on someone is requested by the ban appeal template
@Luke#1634 and swear to never do whatever you did again
You can interpret the template as you please, but the word swear does have connotations of an oath and bounding agreement - therefor making it completely valid for Ashaz to be unwilling to swear.
Quote
@fssp#1966 This is false, and an intellectually dishonest method of discrediting my original post without providing any real substance to that effect.
It isn't false because in Islam it is frowned upon to "swear to something". You assumed it wasn't.
I'm going to leave it at that as this argument has already taken up enough of my time, and yours too.