Posts by RedEastWood
-
-
↩ @' 5 ' he also sent screenshots of his MS teams file cache size when “revealing” May 5th (or whenever it was). i know it was a joke but it just demonstrates that he didnt learn anything from the suspension.
Quote↩ @' 5 ' he was never scared, he only had a sort of “try me bitch” attitude about it. because he knew you were full of shit and he was never your friend.
ur right
-
-
i have never objected more to an reinstatement than this one. you had a stupid ass “joke” in which you insinuated that you’d leak more admin shit, you suggested that you would leak teams stuff, you said that you would “expose” me (without any care of asking me about it). please don’t reply to this with the common “ oh it was just a joke”, that’s a fucking stupid excuse (you use it a lot)
i get that this isn’t the actual application, but I’m just saying it anyways
-
Quote
Why is, objectively, being “killed” worse than having trauma?
-
Quote
! I pray that those who lost their lives in the Copenhagen shooting rest in peace.
I pray that those who lost their lives in the Highland Park shooting rest in peace.
I pray that those who lost their lives in the Chattanooga shooting rest in peace.
I pray that those who lost their lives in the Philadelphia shooting rest in peace.
I pray that those who lost their lives in the Saginaw shooting rest in peace.
I pray that those who lose their lives everyday in the senseless Russo-Ukraine War rest in peace, on both sides.No brother, sister, father, mother or loved one should have to mourn the murder of someone dear to them. As I get older, news sites begin to scare me more. I cannot afford to lose anyone I love, and the thought of it is enough to make me want to break down. I cannot imagine the pain, suffering and anguish that is being experienced every single day as a result of senseless killing. Every number on a news page is a person with friends and family who will miss them.
I cannot do much, but I can pray for those who have lost their lives and pray that these murders stop. This thread is not the place to discuss why these shootings occur, or how to stop them; this thread is for expressing condolences and understanding the human side of mass killings.
Rest in peace.
-
↩ DragonSlayer2189 mind explaining why? or are you going “reveal” it on 25th July
-
↩ fleshly His first admin application was only made in 2015 lol. He’s been lying for years now.
How can he be admin since 2014, or 2013 for that matter, if his first app is from 2015 lol
https://totalfreedom.boards.ne…z-super-admin-application
I even objected on his original app wow (thx Ria)
-
Well done my children….
-
Quote
↩ @'Pau' It’s just that I didn’t gather evidence as I didn’t predict that I would use it to prove on my application.
You don’t need to collect evidence - we have access to this information.
Quote↩ @'Pau' I would have to ask for a benefit of the doubt that I indeed played in the server weeks ago.
This is a lie
-
Quote
↩ @'Pau' I didn’t think about going back to reclaim my position just yet.
The point he made was that you made this reinstatement just 12 minutes after you joined for the first time.
What do you mean you didn’t think about going back to reclaim your position? It only took you 12 minutes from joining to post this, which means you started working on it sooner!
-
I object, you come across as power-hungry (and that’s coming from me)
-
Quote
↩ @' 5 ' records show this reinstatement was submitted at about the same time as your first time joining in however long it has been. and i mean within minutes or seconds of each other. was this a lie?
How can you tell this? I might be confused here but do you mean that his post was on hold for however long and it was actually submitted a while ago?
-
-
Object we dont need any more hub mods
-
@"enchy"#174 you can't use a very clearly biased source in what is meant to be an objective discussion about statistics and facts. If you keep citing facts, make sure they are unbiased and actually accurate. Refer to the sources I mentioned, they are unbiased and have a clear track of how they obtained their results. They do not push any opinion, but rather just give information.
From what Ryan provided, you can clearly see how your source is biased and propaganda at best (considering they don't even mention how they get their data)-
Abort73.com is part of Loxafamosity Ministries, Inc. (LMI), a non-profit 501©3 Christian education corporation. Abort73.com is an online resource designed to creatively and comprehensively educate people about the injustice of abortion, and provide them with simple tools to help pass that education along to others.
QuoteAt least admit that the source you based most of your “economic factor” arguments on is complete horseshit
-
↩ enchy the sources are so different because your source is literal fucking propaganda
↩ RedEastWood refer to this reply
-
Quote
No, I think his point was that murdering a foetus is similar to a slave owner killing a slave. I might have misunderstood so enchy should clear things up. The way it was worded certainly suggests what I thought.
-
Quote
This source is literally biased. It is not even a source, its just propaganda. Look at the title of the pages on the website - “Bringing an end to abortion”, “Case against abortion”.
Sources are meant to be unbiased, with a clear track of how they obtained data. The sources I listed are far better than this piece of propaganda you have mentioned. If this website is where you base all of your statistics from, then I’m sorry to say that your argument is a product of propaganda.
-
I’m going to go ahead and provide some of my own sources
https://www.guttmacher.org/jou…-qualitative-perspectives
Sample Size - 1209 Abortionists
74% Claimed that having a baby would interfere with their jobs, education, or ability to care for another dependant
73% Claimed that they could not afford a baby at the current time
48% Claimed that they did not want to be/bring the baby up with, a single mother.
This source is limited by its creation date, which was in 2005. With the rise of teen pregnancies and a growing relaxation of care regarding sexual intercourse, this source may not be accurate in the current day.
https://bmcwomenshealth.biomed…s/10.1186/1472-6874-13-29
Sample Size - 954 Abortionists
40% (Predominant Reason) - Economic Factors/Financial Reasons
36% - Timing
31% - Partner related issues (Single mother etc.)
64% of women claimed that the reasons for getting an abortion crossed over multiple themes, and there is not just one reason.
This source is from 2013, its recent publishing gives it greater credibility over the previous source. Both sources mention economic factors to be a notable reason for getting an abortion. Also, way over 20%.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2135792
75% of women claimed that a baby would interfere with school, work or other responsibilities
66.6% of women claimed that they could not afford a baby (economic factors)
This source is from 1987! It just shows you how little has changed, and that ECONOMIC FACTORS ARE ONE OF THE MORE DOMINANT REASONS FOR GETTING AN ABORTION. Although this source certainly isn’t relevant to current day, I included it to show a trend.
These sources illustrate the role economic factors play in getting an abortion. Enchy claims that it is “20%”. I call bullshit. Every source I have seen mentions economic factors as dominant, or in the upper two reasons.
