Posts by RedEastWood

Vouch

It would be nice if a moderator cleaned up this entire thread so it’s just the appeal and the vouch/object.

Some of the strikes were absolute bullshit and we need to have a serious think about just how restricting this forum is. That being said I can see a few strikes here that were perfectly valid.

Quote

↩ @'Ryan' Strictly speaking the ban was for violating the discord tos which is indef with no appeal to start with.

The majority of bans will then be indefinite (harassing, spamming, advertising are also in violation of TOS).

Is there any point in voting on this if it doesn’t have an appeal?

I vouch and all but I just found this, I didn’t realise it was an actual server 😭😭

Your discord tag. (Ex: elmon#6023)  

redeastwood#3771

If known, who banned you? (this can be checked)  

Ryan

If known, do you know what time you were approximately banned?  

7:27 PM, January 1st

Why do you think you were banned? (this can also be checked)  

For saying my account was made when I was under 13

Explain why you think you should be unbanned, and promise to never do whatever you did again. If your reason remains unknown, you may skip this question.  

I should be unbanned because it was just a a joke and my account was not actually made when I was under 13. I promise to never do that again.

↩ @'wxtermelon' it was a joke

↩  matscalle I saw that too, good find matscalle. Upon further reading, I found that discord does not offer this service - you must be above the age of digital consent.

I believe I found the monitor responsible for this image

https://i.ibb.co/wytfFSk/F577-…-BDC3-291-D8-C713-AB8.jpg

↩  Akefu-Brewer I never said that, I’m saying you weren’t civil like you claimed to be.

Quote

↩  Akefu-Brewer I was simply having a civil discussion about his ban

I don’t mean to nitpick here, but I think these comments are far from civil,

Quote

↩  Akefu-Brewer That’s hilarious, pity on the weak, who tore themselves down

↩  Akefu-Brewer He just wants to dramatize it all, that’s normal for RedEastWood

This one especially ^

Quote

↩  Akefu-Brewer Your vision of published properly is your biased rules

↩  Akefu-Brewer Because you made the dumb decision

Far from civil ^

Quote

↩  Akefu-Brewer you threw common sense out of the window

↩  Akefu-Brewer you should still be punished for your lack of common sense.

Very far from civil, outright said I lacked common sense. ^

Quote

↩  Akefu-Brewer End of Story.

↩  Alco_Rs11 I think this whole “pity on the weak” thing is trolling in my books.

https://geteso.org/1900289/

I’d appreciate it if you explained this to clear up any false identity issues

Quote

↩  Akefu-Brewer he clearly knew the risks when he was doing it.

↩  RedEastWood I assumed that I would only get banned if there was proof that my account was made when I was under 13.

↩  RedEastWood I feel like you’re only half reading what I’m saying, and are more focused on trolling/looking to get a reaction. I’ve made my reasons very clear, and if they were as stupid as you’re claiming, people wouldn’t have thought the ban was unfair.

I’m now quite certain you’re a troll

Object, this user has seemingly returned to troll and elicit a response from people.

↩  Akefu-Brewer Okay, my account was not made before I was 13 - why am I still banned?

There’s this one YouTube channel, AtomicShrimp, who does these amazing scambaiting videos. Strongly recommend them, plus his series on surviving the day on £1.

ONT - Vouch, but I do think it’ll take quite a bit of work to setup.

↩  Akefu-Brewer No, I’m saying the rules weren’t published properly - something Ryan has (I think, correct if wrong) agreed to. On Ryan’s original post (before the edit), it was not said that he will ban for jokes or without proof.

I feel like you’re only half reading what I’m saying, and are more focused on trolling/looking to get a reaction. I’ve made my reasons very clear, and if they were as stupid as you’re claiming, people wouldn’t have thought the ban was unfair.

↩  Akefu-Brewer The point being that it was not made clear in the original thread that anything could be regarded as proof…

That is why I ended up making that comment, if I had known it would result in an actual ban without proof I wouldn’t have said what I did.

I have outlined all of this in my original post too.

↩  RandomCommentator I assumed that I would only get banned if there was proof that my account was made when I was under 13.

The entire notion of me getting what I asked for is not standard in TF administration - if you go on the freedom server and ask an admin to ban you, they are not allowed to. If they do ban you, they will probably get told off (it has happened before). Proof of violation is needed before one gets banned, and I assumed this would be the case here too. I was making a joke about the entire situation, and it was quite obvious that my account was not violating any guidelines.

I referred to the thread Ryan posted originally (before the edit), and it did not say that any ban could be issues without any reasonable proof.

↩  matscalle I do agree with you, but Ryan owns the domain which makes that a lot trickier than simply changing owners.

↩  matscalle You will not get banned for saying the option.