it really do be your own people stabbing you in the back. seems like people are learning a lesson.
what the fuck are you talking about 😭
ont- vouch, i think you could do well as an admin because i know you’ll take it seriously.
it really do be your own people stabbing you in the back. seems like people are learning a lesson.
what the fuck are you talking about 😭
ont- vouch, i think you could do well as an admin because i know you’ll take it seriously.
i object because almost all of my interactions with this user have been negative. i could provide evidence but i probably won’t unless Luke puts a gun to my head. we shouldn’t be forcing people to present actual evidence, much less people who are/have been admin (img). i don’t understand why this one particular application is being treated as such an exception, maybe i’m missing something.
if a system allows people to gain influence and manipulate and do various despicable stuff then isn’t the system the problem?
No, because if you are in a position of power (admin) you should be trustworthy enough to not manipulate and do various despicable stuff? Isn't that the whole point of a staff position and why we use our judgement to appoint new staff members?
I object. I do not trust you.
Again, too much compromise and too little in return.
my experiences with declan have been identical each time. he begins by acting like a massive twat to me and others, and eventually it gets so bad that i feel no choice other than to retaliate. after this, we have a long conversation during which he apologises but also claims that he “hates everyone”. for example, the last interaction between us stemmed from him continuously claiming that he wanted people to burn in a fire, particularly Kad. prior to this, he was overall a cunt to me when i joined a different freedom server, provoking me by calling me a retard, loser, and someone with no friends. i didn’t take these comments to heart and replied in an equal way, hoping declan would be able to take as much as he gave. i did take his comments about wanting people to die to heart, and talked to him about it in dms. after some more insulting from both of our parts, he did eventually apologise and chalked his comments to “hating everyone”. i left it at that. this cycle happened before too, but this was the most recent one.
even if amber and declan are two different identities (which i personally doubt), declan has genuine problems and has acted very poorly to other ops and admins. he is generally very rude and pessimistic, eg i vaguely remember declan shitting on people wishing bowie a happy birthday, and my experience w him has been very negative.
so i vouch.
edit - it’s also too much of a risk, as declan himself has said he can’t control what amber does. so by that logic, he wouldn’t be able to control it if amber logged in to the admin account and abused, or worse. this just isn’t a position we should be in, and i feel like we are being far too sympathetic. if declan was more courteous to those around him then fair enough, but rn it seems like we just keep making exceptions and are getting nothing in return.
i feel like an lbr is too much for some nsfw remarks
i vouch. the window is stupid, but i think achieving senior admin in general should be difficult.
oh never mind i’m not allowed to say that my bad
guilds and roleplay plugins
way back machine
how in the fuck are you employed 😂
anyways vouch and rec you’re trustworthy and reliable, which is what being an admin is all about. immaturity and the inclination to joke around shouldn’t be held against an admin, otherwise we would be very hypocritical.
the Gaussian Integral
A freedom server
Okay, normal members cannot vouch or object
everyone can vouch and object. also, what do you mean normal members?