Posts by characterslimits

Quote from root

Quote from root

can you please elaborate further on this?

like, how you'd envision this working n such?

repeating my question here as it was ignored.

objecting otherwise.

Display More

Alright I will answer.. I didn't answer because I needed time to think

Now, the reason why I envision this to be successful is because not many people have actually created a Skyblock server with freedom. Just think about it, how many Skyblock servers you went on allowed you to switch between gamemodes, or use WorldEdit?

Because there's barely any server that does this, this grants TotalFreedom quite a lot of marketing potential.

I have created a Google Sheets document as a proof of concept:

indefbans

Sheet1 Username,UUID,Link to IBR,Reason,Evidence,Filed at,Expires,Outcome,Status griefer,aaaa-1111-bbbb-2222,<a…

docs.google.com

Adding entries wasn't hard, so why isn't this suggestion approved sooner?

Quote from videogamesm12

...So basically a void world?

Didn't you literally wanted something like this in the past?

I'm going to vouch for the sole reason that he has been banned for long enough.

Retracted

Quote from Allink

Quote from ginlang

I haven't really seen much of Fedora, I'm guessing its worth looking into then?

For what it's worth it's miles better than anything Debian or Debian-based distros can offer

How exactly?

IGN: characterslimits

Potential time per week able to support testing: 40 hours per week

(In a couple of sentences max) Why would you like to help test new functionality for TF?: Because I would like to improve the overall stability of the server by being the first to test new functionality and find bugs sooner so they don't arise on production environments.

Quote from Admin Pre-Application Checklist

13. Please ensure you have a personalized avatar for your forum profile - you'll be asked to add one if you neglect this.

I can only think of one reason why this is mandated: professionalism. Otherwise I disagree with forcing avatars for when applying for admin because avatars have absolutely no correlation with actual admin performance. Additionally, this is the only point of time where avatars are mandated, after when you're approved for admin you can just remove your avatar anyway, therefore ruining the whole point. Additionally additionally, they aren't even mandated when reinstating.

So yeah, remove 13 from the Admin Pre-Application Checklist.

You see, this is why transparency is important, by vouching on suggestions like Maintain a public list of indefinitely banned players and ongoing requests you are putting administration in check. Nothing good has happened when players are silently banned and this is one of those instances.

Quote from videogamesm12

and not have [FastAsyncWorldEdit] crash from ridiculous galaxy brain mistakes like fucking loading schematics from the web, use AsyncWorldEdit.

I don't know when this is added, but more recent versions of FastAsyncWorldEdit will now attempt to fix schematics if they have a problem.

Add FastAsyncVoxelSniper because.. well.. I'm not really a builder, but Miwo said so, so let's add it.

Only problem is that FAWE is a dependancy, WE/AWE will not work.

The original VoxelSniper is abandoned and does not work with versions 1.13 and newer, besides the original version is not asynchronous and does not respect region protection, while FAVS does.

Yes, this is created by the same team that made FAWE

Files - FastAsyncVoxelSniper - Bukkit Plugins - Projects - Bukkit

Vouch, as this is something that we should already have been doing from the start

Also, also long term bans should also be included (if it isn't implied that they will)

Alright, problem solved. The MVP here is isaac

(If there's a template for conduct reports, please tell me. I couldn't find it)

motorroller was caught griefing using worldedit at spawn, the evidence of such is posted below

Quote from videogamesm12

My main concern with this is that it may actually negatively influence votes. The fact its isolated from the public's eye makes it significantly more difficult for someone to influence people's votes through pressure politics.

I will not vote on this, as I would like to know what other Seniors and even Executives think first.

Back then, before Ryan Wild was owner, when an executive position became vacant, admins can apply to be nominated for that position. There would be a poll that allows you to vote which nomiee should receive the position in question. However, the thing is: this poll was public, everyone can see and vote on it. Meaning, this whole "pressure politics" is not new to TotalFreedom.

Retracted

Quote from videogamesm12

Yes, we blocked it because initially we blocked a problematic portion of it using some regex magic but then some fucking dickhead over at EngineHub thought it was a good idea to accept quotation marks in the fucking arguments and someone abused this fact to untracably grief. Fucking garbage plugin.

Does FAWE handle this any better?

Quote from Tizz

Quote from Telesphoreo

This won't work with tfm

IIRC Paldiu's working on making TFM finally compatible with permission nodes.

Videogamesmash already did this, why are we doing something that someone else has already done before?

Quote from Xen

Ultimately though, it is going to be up to developers (and Wild of course) and if they’re willing to be on a constant cat and mouse chase for bugs and exploits.

This is what we're already doing on Freedom-01

Quote from Alco_Rs11

I Object.

Players who are banned do not deserve to see the server chat. By your logic, we then should also block players from chatting and editing shit in the game without removing them then because that's basically the same thing and we all know that will never happen so why should we let banned players see the server chat on discord?

They're banned so they lose the right to access the respective platform they were banned from for the duration of the ban and that includes the platform's respective server-chats on discord.

This is what we're doing for forum bans. Being forum banned does not prevent you from reading posts, yes it does prevent you from logging in, but otherwise, you can still read the forum being logged out.

For your logic to be consistent, we would need to take forum bans a step further and prevent anyone who is forum banned from reading any posts.