I wasn't referring to that at all? The way you spoke on the server (inconsistent capitalization between messages, most of your messages having proper capitalization) perfectly matched SaulDoodman's. I know it's not definitive proof in itself, but it's one of the many coincidences that seems to have somehow happened.
You're using capitalization as a means to over-exaggerate the unlikelihood of a coincidence that happened? And even when you're making that argument, you said yourself it's "inconsistent." This argument doesn't actually mean anything, and capitalization is a behavior that very, very easily could change from day to day.
So you just so happened to join minutes after someone with a very similar username to yours received a message notifying them that they were indefinitely banned, and upon joining made the exact same joke they did? How am I expected to believe that these are just coincidences?
Yes. I did just happen to join minutes after "SaulDoodman," whose username was an extremely common pop culture reference. I joined to make the same pop culture reference. It's not like it's a coincidence that we made the same joke. It's extremely common, and you have probably seen it countless times before from someone other than me or this other player.
Read the timestamps. It's pretty suspicious to me that after a player named SaulDoodman tried to join the server and got rejected with a message notifying them that they were indefinitely banned, 11 minutes later a new player named SaulZoodman show up on the server for the first time and make the same jokes.
Again, it's not at all unlikely that two people would make the same pop culture reference. If you factor that out, (like you should be doing because of the lack of significant connection,) you get that one player joined minutes after another player received a message that they were banned. That doesn't actually mean anything.
Good one buddy. I'm actually arguing that you bypassed the ban which you received as SaulDoodman.
No, you're not. You're arguing that I, a player who currently has no evidence or proof of any wrongdoing tied to their account, should be banned because of your speculation. Unless you can provide any proof that I did anything wrong, the fact remains that that's the position you're taking here.
New players are assumed innocent, but with all the shit I mentioned before, your own innocence is questionable.
You can't say "new players are assumed innocent" when I'm a new player and should have been assumed innocent but wasn't. That claim now no longer holds any water.