Posts by frizzydoggy

currently it's like this

no one else posted it so i thought that i should

Btw Open AI updated it so it points out that it's an AI and not a person when prompted to respond as if it was a human (Examples, asking How are you?, asking to roleplay n such) , though this warning can be disabled by asking it to disable it I think.

I object to this application.

The applicant has no experience in server administration, and they lack the necessary technical knowledge to effectively manage a Minecraft server.

[generated by chatgpt/_nsfw]

Quote from MagAgentV3

Not a big fan of the levels system or IP verification because. A. a level system just sounds pointless and restricting stuff because you aren't high level just sounds like you have to be on discord everyday just to grind levels and it pings you everytime you go up a level and it's annoying B. IP verification is dumb because what If you get a new router and yours breaks or your moving or you are on the go and want to talk via mobile data and everytime you would want to talk you would have to verify everytime it would just be pointless anyway because VPN's exist so raiders can just bypass that

Response to B: By IP verification I meant a one-time IP verification when new users join the server and it wouldn't be to verify the user's identity but to check if they already have an account in the server, and VPNs can be detected.

Hello, I’d like to reach out to make a request due to late events where raiders joined the Discord server and posted explicit, disturbing content in there (images depicting mutilated bodies is the little I could see), in possible attempts of causing mental harm to members of the community (it’s a 13+ server so it could have caused real harm if there were more people at the moment, which wasn’t the case)

My request consists of adding *at least basic* verification measures to the Discord server to prevent raiders from joining or banned players from evading bans. This could be done in a variety of ways such as reimplementing in-game verification or adding an IP verification bot to prevent VPN and alts. An instance of the latter is the Double Counter bot, which is used for verifying that users are not accessing the server using multiple accounts. It allows the staff to set multiple actions, such as tracking the identities of alternate accounts based on their IP, or denying access to alternate accounts altogether. Additionally, it has the ability of detecting VPN usage, so it’d do a good job restricting raiders from joining and banned players from evading their bans.

I’d also like to say that although verification measures are really important for the server, legitimate members should be minimally affected by these, and for that to be possible I suggest that either only newly created accounts undergo verification, or for verification measures to be enabled only when deemed necessary by the Staff team, such as when raids can be anticipated (Which I believe was the case in the latest raid, since the Minecraft server was suspected to have been subjected to DDOS attacks prior to the Discord raid).

Another preventive method to keep raids like the latest from taking place again is by restricting the permission of sending media in the server, this could be done by requiring accounts to be for x time in the server before being able to send media or by adding a levels system based on chat activity (most Discord servers have the latter), this would be a great way of making raiding more difficult without causing trouble for legitimate members.

(TL;DR below)

I’ll include a summarized list of the ideas I suggested to make it easier for you to decide your viewpoint on this suggestion:

- Add an in-game verification for accessing the Discord server

- Add an IP verification on Discord to stop ban evading and raiding

- Make the 2 ideas above only applicable for users with newly created accounts

- Enable verification only when the Staff team expects raids to take place

- Require accounts to be in the server for a certain time before they can send media

- Require accounts to engage with the community before they can send media

Please note that the way that I suggest these ideas to happen, it would cause little to no trouble to legitimate members, and it'd make it more difficult for raiders to cause trouble in the server so I strongly believe that this would be very beneficial for us.

I also encourage the Staff team to correct my ideas in the way they see most appropriate for the server as these can probably be improved to either be more effective or make a better experience for legitimate members.

Quote from ThePharmaPirate

I am creating this thread to let everyone know I am changing my IGN from "ThePharmaPirate" to "PharmaAS"

no you aren't

Quote from wild1145

Quote from DragonSlayer2189

It should be noted that Warps and core protect data are unlikely to be included in the world download.

Historic CoreProtect data is / will be provided as I get to uploading and processing it.

Warps will be provided when we archive the world, there's probably no real harm in releasing those earlier, I was originally reluctant due to privacy concerns but might be something that makes sense to upload earlier.

Thank you for releasing these! I'll personally make good use of the CoreProtect data 😊😊

vouch, sounds like a great plugin that would fit the server

Quote from Panther

I object. This seems like a good idea at first, but the issue I have with it is that it diminishes the opinions of the voters - especially OPs - for any given admin application. It gives the unknown person/group who controls the training process too much power in deciding whether the applicant gets the position.

as far as I know, the current system allows ex-admins to reinstate without any vote or trial, as votes are only for admin applications and not reinstatements, so the enforcement of a trial system in reinstatements would not take away (or diminish) any power from OPs that they currently have, perhaps you confused reinstatements with admin applications?

After reading the responses above, I object to this report for the reasons that Ryan and Alco have stated, and I agree with the administrative actions taken by Pharma and Ashaz.

vouch this is gonna be so interesting

Quote from Alco_Rs11

Have you changed your username or obtained a new account recently? I cannot find your username or UUID in the indefinite ban file or public list nor can I find any indefinite ban request for the username DiscordTonyStark.

I found the entry by searching their UUID in the Indefinite Ban list, they're Mastermine1984.

oh god im so sorry really i dont like reading

Quote from frizzydoggy

Quote from wild1145

Code

Wtwt Wtct Anhm... Lr flcwr ngro doew mn gnt bhhi octlcee tf klbpci kl ttafele ro esd, ctfvu gr t rga io c reioe nihdaq. T tor dqomcrhtt rga mle nn cola mtec ebtnes (Arpttfadsoq aln Qblre). 

Ce cnrp rnqo d fvp doec xatgmlcoarp, W'm ngbhh cv pgaid h Flteoot Ehetb Nauc tgm ses pkdqa qtecol hese sesnpbs ur reybho qa ecdr dmsmqep xoi asknbi hpo ispidetnmbin. 

Dcdr bro op rqsspv qe, oqwask npo'n oonnm pmo obw ainrcno mv wtgy lorpth, lc G'mo gogs q nps gdawseam (Ltvlr pt mbg gog nmdp gtqcd epx'rd dn marg li sskdom) mq eoiaupx qasl dlb swkpog lg odmio ht gftrw ru mp. 

Moow eduf <3  

WELLWELLWELLJTLOOKSLJKENONEOFYOUHAVEMANAGEDTODECODEMYMESSAGESOFARWHJCHJSABJTOFASHAMEREALLYJWASEXPECTJNGYOUALLTOHAVEDONEBETTERESPECJALLLYYOUVJDEOTOMAKETHJSABJTMOREJNTERESTJNGJMGOJNGTOOFFERADJSCORDNJTROGJFTFORTHEFJRSTPERSONTHATMANAGESTODECODEMYLASTMESSAGEANDFOLLOWTHEJNSTRUCTJONSONCEYOUDODECODEJTPLEASEDONTSHAREHOWYOUDECODEDJTWJTHOTHERSASJLLMAKEANEWMESSAGERWHJCHJFYOUDJDTHJSRJGHTYOULLBEABLETODECJDETOEXPLAJNWHATTHERUNNERUPPRJZEJSGOJNGTOBEGOODLUCK

yep this is the answer, it's Bifid cipher, and the key is "totalfreedom". (if it's a little off maybe there needs to be a little change in the encryption key idk but its readable enough to get the sentence from there.

WELLWELLWELLITLOOKSLIKENONEOFYOUHAVEMANAGEDTODECODEMYMESSAGESOFARWHICHISABITOFASHAMEREALLYIWASEXPECTINGYOUALLTOHAVEDONEBETTERESPECIALLLYYOUVIDEOTOMAKETHISABITMOREINTERESTINGIMGOINGTOOFFERADISCORDNITROGIFTFORTHEFIRSTPERSONTHATMANAGESTODECODEMYLASTMESSAGEANDFOLLOWTHEINSTRUCTIONSONCEYOUDODECODEITPLEASEDONTSHAREHOWYOUDECODEDITWITHOTHERSASILLMAKEANEWMESSAGERWHICHIFYOUDIDTHISRIGHTYOULLBEABLETODECIDETOEXPLAINWHATTHERUNNERUPPRIZEISGOINGTOBEGOODLUCK

Replacing J's with I's ^

WELL WELL WELL IT LOOKS LIKE NONE OF YOU HAVE MANAGED TO DECODE MY MESSAGE SO FAR WHICH IS A BIT OF A SHAME REALLY I WAS EXPECTING YOU ALL TO HAVE DONE BETTER ESPECIALLLY YOU VIDEO TO MAKE THIS A BIT MORE INTERESTING IM GOING TO OFFER A DISCORD NITRO GIFT FOR THE FIRST PERSON THAT MANAGES TO DECODE MY LAST MESSAGE AND FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS ONCE YOU DO DECODE IT PLEASE DONT SHARE HOW YOU DECODED IT WITH OTHERS AS ILL MAKE A NEW MESSAGER WHICH IF YOU DID THIS RIGHT YOULL BE ABLE TO DECIDE TO EXPLAIN WHAT THE RUNNER UP PRIZE IS GOING TO BE GOOD LUCK
with proper spacing ^

I'm sorry for posting the answer cipher, I didn't read it yet when i posted it :p
oh god im so sorry fr

Quote from wild1145

Code

Wtwt Wtct Anhm... Lr flcwr ngro doew mn gnt bhhi octlcee tf klbpci kl ttafele ro esd, ctfvu gr t rga io c reioe nihdaq. T tor dqomcrhtt rga mle nn cola mtec ebtnes (Arpttfadsoq aln Qblre). 

Ce cnrp rnqo d fvp doec xatgmlcoarp, W'm ngbhh cv pgaid h Flteoot Ehetb Nauc tgm ses pkdqa qtecol hese sesnpbs ur reybho qa ecdr dmsmqep xoi asknbi hpo ispidetnmbin. 

Dcdr bro op rqsspv qe, oqwask npo'n oonnm pmo obw ainrcno mv wtgy lorpth, lc G'mo gogs q nps gdawseam (Ltvlr pt mbg gog nmdp gtqcd epx'rd dn marg li sskdom) mq eoiaupx qasl dlb swkpog lg odmio ht gftrw ru mp. 

Moow eduf <3  

WELLWELLWELLJTLOOKSLJKENONEOFYOUHAVEMANAGEDTODECODEMYMESSAGESOFARWHJCHJSABJTOFASHAMEREALLYJWASEXPECTJNGYOUALLTOHAVEDONEBETTERESPECJALLLYYOUVJDEOTOMAKETHJSABJTMOREJNTERESTJNGJMGOJNGTOOFFERADJSCORDNJTROGJFTFORTHEFJRSTPERSONTHATMANAGESTODECODEMYLASTMESSAGEANDFOLLOWTHEJNSTRUCTJONSONCEYOUDODECODEJTPLEASEDONTSHAREHOWYOUDECODEDJTWJTHOTHERSASJLLMAKEANEWMESSAGERWHJCHJFYOUDJDTHJSRJGHTYOULLBEABLETODECJDETOEXPLAJNWHATTHERUNNERUPPRJZEJSGOJNGTOBEGOODLUCK

Vouch, as far as I understand this member had no malice in their actions and didn't cause any damage to the server or other players, should be unbanned.

hii welcome

nvm

I'm not sure if this is the right place to say this but since post is about coins I'll go ahead and say it:

I think that /shop coins could be potentially used to allow features such as disguise to the regular players who would use them and restrict the access to avoid exploiting, so everyone could buy it but only the people who actually play can afford it, raiders wouldn't be able to just join and abuse exploits as they'd have to grind for the coins first, and if a raider grinds coins for months to buy perms to abuse an exploit, they can simply be banned.

uwu owo nyaa :3

Vouch, player is very active and has contributed to the server (example of this last statement is when they helped to test plugins in dev server)