Posts by Tizz

Welcome back

@StevenNL2000#18736 @DragonSlayer2189#18762 Wouldn't /ew FIREWORK get rid of any harmful firework?

Quote

@StevenNL2000#18736 The firework limitation is obviously because of particle lag

So if a player complains about client lag we could just toggle them off and warn/sanction who caused it

Vouch for a second chance

Vouch for lava damage in survival (unless there's a technical reason it's disabled).

Object to TNT, explosions without actual damage are only good for harming the server.

Vouch for fireworks, we can't block every fun thing that can be used maliciously. If players abuse them, we'll punish them. Can't we set up plugins like VP to have a limit on number of fireworks?

@lyicx#18696 It was way better than your fanfic

Still it's been one of those "why and why can't I leave" moments

@lyicx#18694 How much will you pay me?

I wonder if independent candidates are allowed. It would be fun wathing them stealing votes.

Cafe72 Please edit your post and answer questions 2 and 6 of the indefinite ban release form

I've seen players saying they haven't permission until they rejoined so I'm not sure it's fixed

@wild1145#18316 Probably lazy programming and/or lack of data sanification. Sorry for the kind of OT.

@wild1145#18312 Can we fix those schematics where it's said "illegal file name, can't download"? (probably chars like .()[] to be removed).

@UnderTails#18302 I've been told cross-server chat is a thing and easily implemented while shared schematics list is already on plan.

The only thing is you can't share clipboard across multiple server instances, either you use a mod (somebody've said Schematica but I see it's outdated) or the schematics system must be flexible enough not to become messy because of people using it as a clipboard surrogate.

Quote

@wild1145#18246 We ban people for their actions... Not their potential / past actions.

That's why I'm against preventive ban.

Quote

@wild1145#18246 authority sits with the executive ban manager, lead developer or owner of the server to issue / approve the banning of players where open indef ban requests are outstanding

What about suspending the 24 hours expiration while an indef ban request is open for the same reason the player has been banned? For example, a mass griefer gets banned, a request is filed for that reason, the ban won't be lifted until the ban manager rejects the request or turns it into a proper indefinite ban.

I like Steve's idea. If not viable, I'd stick with the current option (the 4th) and let admins know the responsibility... falls on them.

Object unless you can buy that command in the shop

But I vouch to nerf that loud thing at least a bit

I still don't understand if Miasmus's replies in the original joke thread are serious or advanced trolling.

Anyway I vouch for the edited request (warning)

I was offline at the time so all I can find is that qkqs is banned for unrelated reason (griefing)

Quote

@Miasmus#17868 what i reported him for is 100% bannable

There must be evidence he's not joking. Attempting to harm the server is against the conduct policy, not just saying it, in this case admins must observe actions and collect evidence.

In your case, I scrolled to your messages and I see you were asking players to leave the server with a pretty rude attitude, included the alleged threat to crash them, upsetting them. I believe it's mainly this that made sleepy videogamesm12 decide to ban you.

James seems like this is an actual report despite the funny presentation.

@fleshly#17842 I prefer Shycx because she didn't want that name

Neutral, it looks better imo but I understand the practical advantage of a more compact style as of now.