Aaaaaaand Infinity Discord's been locked down.
Posts by Tizz
-
-
Pay ClayCoconut for his drawings NOW
-
-
Quote
↩ simplynick will have to appoint someone else to take your position.
As Darwin has said, Volleo's officially a co-owner in Infinity Discord, so this will be easy
-
Red has worked hard for the community while he was a staff member, so I'll vouch.
It's up to the owner (Ryan) and the EAO (Video) to decide additional conditions for staff applications.
-
-
-
Link for who doesn't know what does the command exactly do
Interesting note as well:QuoteHowever, when this command was added, tameable animals were not a thing and the loss of entities was not an issue, but this is no longer the case and this command should be reserved for extremely desperate occasions
-
I'm worried by his post history. How can I trust his judgement after seeing how he votes on stuff?
Object -
-
Anti is a very nice and dedicated player. I believe that, with the help of the team, she'll be able to handle the new responsibilities.
Vouch
-
I like how this exposes a lot of cringy guild names
-
↩ videogamesm12 I agree. Meanwhile, Quack has transferred ownership to enchy.
However, as this is soon to be taken over by Ryan, I'm not sure how much work we should put into it.
-
Section 0c of the Server Conduct Policy already covers actions outside TF that cause harm to it or its members.
Object to original suggestion. -
↩ ClayCoconut I remember those colourful glass things that have a glow effect when hit by direct light. Guess what, there's uranium in them.
-
So Infinity is basically a plot device?
ETA: you know what, Quack should call whatever Infinity uses to manipulate the dark matter the "plot device" for some meta humour.
-
-
The only way out is for bot makers to strike a deal with streaming platforms. The easy way is with free platforms which provide mostly underground music. No idea how expensive would be a deal between, like, Rythm and Spotify.
-
He has to message StevenNL2000#7113 using the form in the Indefinite Ban Request Policy, under the paragraph "Self request"
-
I think the reason behind the rule is that abusing commands floods server logs and admins' chat.
I don't consider it "spam" if a player retypes the same command each second for a short period of time, if doing that makes sense. If they're faster, I advice them to optimise their commands, e.g. by including a multiplier for the action (//undo 5, /asc 2, /spawnmob <entity> 10...)
However, if somebody uselessly repeats commands, uses hacks to rapidly send them, or does shady things like summoning tens of endermen (see latest IBR), then I apply the rule by warning or or blocking commands.
I object to removing the mention to commands.