@videogamesm12#17096 To clarify, in TFM terms a title is also a "Rank". The difference is generally something we use here based on if they have more perms than the "Primary" Rank the player is. Like MB's are a title as they sit outside of the standard rank order for OP's an admins.
Posts by wild1145
-
-
Will raise a bug to look into it, answer might be going back to not supporting heads in cage...
FS-246 raised to investigate.
-
DG-8 raised to look into this.
-
FS-245 raised for videogamesm12 to go fault find his bug

-
Given I think bending has been removed from the server now, this should be resolved.
-
Closing as invalid bug
-
Yeah as Fleek has said, re-write is in order. I've raised FS-244 to track it, which should get fixed in the future.
-
So I'm going to approve this.
FS-239 - Log Blockcmd
FS-240 - Log Blockedit and BlockPVP only when it's not applied globally to all online players.
FS-241 - Log cage
FS-242 - Log OrbitWarn is already raised under a previous reply here.
And because I've remembered, FS-243 is the bug with Cage we currently have, not related to this post, but it reminded me so yay.
-
Not 100% sure this is possible again without either heavy extension fudging or theme fudging. On this occasion I'm going to deny the suggestion.
-
I guess similar to the explosive arrows, if we could make sure anything that is done is logged to CoreProtect properly, would people be down to making this a shop item?
-
Yep approved. Will be handled based on the last 30 days from when the role is updated going forward.
lyicx FYI
-
@StevenNL2000#15704 Is it viable (Also paging Fleek at this point) for us to have a command that mimics the Vanilla command, but restricts only to the player issuing the command? I'm guessing plugins and the bukkit API have come access to advancements logic?
-
Denied.
If an admin is being reckless enough to blindly run random commands, that's something that needs to be taken up with the EAO and the admin removed / re-trained...
-
Closing as denied due to lack of support.
-
Given the issues identified and the fact admins are bound by the server conduct policy as highlighted in @Fleek#15641 's reply there, I'm going to deny this suggestion.
-
-
@UnderTails#17076 Ahh I'm with you now. That's what I was missing. Had not occurred to me that you'd be using it in combination with other blocks.
Given we've done something similar with Worldedit to facilitate placing items that can fall (Thus killing TPS / clients) it would be good to do something similar here.
Fleek would appreciate your thoughts on if we can do this without risking lagging the shit out of the server...
-
@UnderTails#17081 So the plan will be that schematics will be linked up across the servers, but //copy //paste wouldn't work as they'd be two totally separate instances of Minecraft. Exactly how all of it will work in detail is being worked through in slow time, but it's pretty important from my perspective to be able to do these splits, as I suspect in reality it'll let us un-block more things in those specific servers because of the different limitations in place (Ie more plot perms because you won't actually be OP in the plot world, we can basically set it up to be as permissive as possible to make the build experience better).
Freedom-01 is a major problem for me at the moment because we don't wipe anything, so splitting servers out is pretty important to ensure we can actually continue to scale, not to mention it'll end up meaning we can tune servers better than what we have today. That's why I'm not sure if a void world makes sense, given the current worlds already on FreeOP.
Other thought, what's the reason for not using the end for this sort of stuff, is that not supposed to be mostly empty?
-
@Luke#17066 True, but there's equally nothing stopping anyone else using those tags (Not against the rules strictly speaking iirc). This would be to add an in-game only title / rank / whatever you want to call it, in return for voting. Something very different to a discord role which was my reason for clarifying.
-
Sounds sensible enough to me.
Approved under FS-238