If folks have any further ideas on what could be included in the subscription model type use of coins your feedback would be appreciated.
I've also got some thoughts in addition to what RedEastWood has said above, but would appreciate the community feedback before I close this thread.
It looks like this has been superseded, can you highlight for me what addition to the other thread you're looking for?
So I like the idea of supplementing the reactions settings with some additional game types, it keeps it interesting and helps make it more competitive. Some of it we can automatically generate, some of it will rely on us crafting / getting our hands on a database.
FS-275 raised to add basic mathematical operations.
FS-276 to add config options to enable / disable the current reactions gamemode
FS-277 to add a trivia mode of some sorts based off of a database.
FS-278 to add the dictionary word un-scramble along with minimum word length config option.
FS-273 raised to add this to the shop and verify CoreProtect logging status. I've tagged it provisionally against the July 2021 release of TFM.
I've raised FS-270 to allow admins to toggle tags for the guild, so when a guild is using stupidly long tags, admins can disable that guild from using tags at all.
FS-271 to set a configurable guilds tag limit generally.
FS-272 to create the ability for the TFM Tag to be rejected if it exceeds an overall length (Total of the user tag and guild tag) and to check on login, purging the tag if the players tag is longer than the configured maximum.
Based on the feedback here I'm going to deny this suggestion for now, and would suggest if people have a change of heart in the future we can re-visit the suggestion.
Given the thread I linked does cover both scenarios (Signs and /auc) I'm going to deny this as a duplicate.
For reference FS-8 is to add a /auc command setup where players can auction items for coins, with FS-9 being to add signs for auctions of items using the coins system.
DG-9 raised to review the permissions and fix it, and spawn any tickets on to the dev team if permissions cannot be resolved.
On the grounds nobody bothered to give further feedback, FS-269 has been raised to add a command to wipe all armour stands from the server which admins can invoke where required. That will be done before FS-232 is delivered to ensure when we stop the auto wipe admins can manually wipe.
On the grounds that I can't see the poll and there is limited voting, I'll bump this for lyicx to review.
I've raised FS-268 to look into if we do actively need to maintain our own clone of LibsDisguises and if so to scope the exact work required to make this happen. I'll mark it as approved but with the understanding that this is only really approved to investigate.
Quote@redeastwood#19945 My personal opinion is heavily based on the fact that these inactive users did not specify any reason for vouching, instead they simply said "vouch". Had there been actual justification, I would have felt more secure with the fact that there are genuine vouches based on informed decisions.
The same happens for most admins... I often see applications that just say vouch or object with no reasoning at all. Until the policy on that changes for everyone, I can't really encourage the EAO to discount valid votes on this application or any others.
@Miasmus#19872 it's not yet been reviewed properly which is why it's still open. Me or fleek tend to go through these in bulk when we get a chance.
Given the term admin on its own is more commonly used and generally understood, I'd like to see a really good reason why we would want to go back to such naming schemes, especially for the sake of it...
@Luke#19779 You can vouch or object for whatever arbitrary reason you feel like...
And any user on the forums with an account over 30 days old can place a vote. It's as simple as that.
@StevenNL2000#19549 Will look into that. Wasn't aware that was a thing, seen this sort of stuff done before but never like that.
