Posts by Luke

    Quote

    did not think much of my usage of the word on other platforms and how this reflected on TF.

    So, you openly call people the hard r n word relating directly to TF, encouraging them to register and vote for you... and you didn't expect that to reflect at all on TF?

    Quote

    this was an attempt to again appeal to the demographic that esotalk

    I swear esotalk has like 10 users and most are already on TF. Who were you actually appealing to? The 3 people not on here?

    Quote

    lyicx im cutting it out now but like at the same time i do say these words outside of TF and always have done

    Cutting it out now? You're the Assistant Server Liasion. Why were you using those words in relation to TF in the first place?


    It's unreasonable of myself to try and force you to not use those words outside of TF, however if you use them in relation to TF while being an assistant exec (and potential forum mod) it seems very unlikely you didn't realise the implications

    Quote

    @lyicx#15215 i realised this when there was a conversation about esotalk earlier on.

    You realised you fucked up when you got caught. Just say that instead of the paragraph of bullshit you’ve come up with.

    Quote

    @Luke#15211 Just thought people should know this before not casting their vote for ECM. Also thought @lyicx should know what his other self are up to as representatives of our community 🙂

    This is an assistant executive? Absolutely disgusting. I had a convo w him earlier regarding this and he just acted like he said it to do business - "he wanted to appeal to the community".


    He also only replaced the word to be "politically correct", and through no remorse of own. Terrible representation of TF as a whole.


    Take new information into account when voting.

    Hello yes


    Just thought I'd bring to everyone's attention this


    http://imgur.com/a/g4CGrtb


    Upon realising its bad p word he didnt change it


    http://imgur.com/a/g4CGrtb


    Just thought people should know this before not casting their vote for ECM. Also thought lyicx should know what his other self are up to as representatives of our community 🙂


    Application closes in -48 hours. Please reconsider if you want this dude to represent the community further as an executive.


    i censored the words - i didnt know if i could put the raw word so like


    Vote RedEastWood

    @UnderTails#15206 Well yeah but that doesn't answer my question. Even if Ryan is 'wrong' (even though it's his opinion..) what do you aim to achieve by arguing when its evident he won't change his mind?

    my main worry is that, forgetting the bigotry (because it was a while ago and I trust you've learnt your lesson), as an admin you mainly showed up, went afk for a few hours, then logged off again. following that, I do distinctly remember there being multiple objections on your application, but Robin approved it anyway given we 'needed more admins' (which i reckon is bullshit) and thus I think you should give it a little more time than you may have planned in between this thread and your actually reinstatement to prove to the other members of the community that you deserve this position. I'd personally give it a few months, but it's your call. Good luck

    While I thank users like @chargenation1158 and man for trying to help, just note Fionn and Elmon established it wasn't me threatening to say the n word more I said a word that looked similar as well as my overall attitude.


    Honestly Fionn has already noted he's keeping watch so I'd rather just lock this thread and move on, I don't see any benefit in continuing the discussion

    Quote

    @elmon#11721 That I wasn't aware of but regardless, you weren't doing your job so frankly you get what you get. You clearly had a no-fucks-given attitude towards TotalFreedom as a whole so I don't know why do you expect to be entitled to your position?

    Because I expect to he treated the same as everyone else. Having a poor attitude isn't against the rules nor should I be held to any higher standard for it. Someone literally posted shit on the forum, and based on their attitude they don't care either yet they only got a 2 weeks suspension. Am I right in saying thats the same Yukari that's been banned several times prior?

    Quote

    @elmon#11721 The indefinite sentence is given because the attitude you had was pretty persistent so we had no way of knowing how long it would take for that to change. If it has changed since then, then great and I hope your journey back to Senior is quick.

    There's no way it was about my attitude. If you wanted to ensure my attitude changed you could've warned me beforehand. You know, 'Luke, you need to stop doing this before you get removed'. Or even better yet just let me get removed for inactivity. Instead you just made sure I got suspended because I said you couldn't, even as a joke. I wasn't even aware that my attitude was causing issues to the point where I could've been removed for it? In fact, Fionn even encouraged this shit by telling me to ragequit, other admins also engaged in the same shit I was doing?

    @Ashaz#11718

    @elmon#11716 I have to work from admin again according to fionn and I also have to go through another lengthy process just to be able to reach that point for something I feel is unfair.


    What's the point in inactivity removals if the EAO can just indefinitely suspend people for not doing their job?


    Quite frankly I'd have preferred to just been suspended for 3 months or whatever because what I did didn't warrant an indefinite suspension and it seems to me I only got the indefinite sentence out of spite because I said you couldn't

    Quote

    @redeastwood#11705 In the admin chat he pushed for fionn to suspend him quite a few times (jokingly of course)

    It should be made clear that I was joking. I said 'what are you gonna do, suspend me?' as a joke in it's entirety. I also said this to James. It makes me think the indefinite suspension wasn't actually about my 'attitude', it was entirely out of spite because I said they couldn't.

    Quote

    @redeastwood#11705 I will say this though, if @fionn has warned Luke about his attitude, and can provide evidence of this, I will happily change my vote. That would be disobeying the EAO's warnings, which is grounds for suspension.

    http://imgur.com/a/J7UeKaF


    I wasn't warned. Feb 1st was when it happened which is in the ss

    @fionn#11684 I don't understand what you mean. My attitude didn't change before the suspension. No, of course it didn't, that's why I was suspended. But I then decided to take 2 months away to decide what I wanted to do going further and I decided I needed to change my outlook on things if I ever wanted to return, and I did. I can't go back and change my attitude then but I can going forward. I'm not asking you to instantly unsuspend me; I'm saying take the next few months before May 1st to review whether or not I should be unsuspended.


    How about this: set May 1st as a deadline but, should you feel I need more time as a normal user, extend it further, even if you have no proper reasoning. I'd have no objections to that