vouch this guy is autistic
Posts by Luke
-
-
Quote
↩ RedEastWood overjoyed
me
laters red you did a good job & i wish you got treated far better than you did
-
-
imo we should put a notice saying that the ecm/emm has the ability to change/wipe logins that are breaking the rules. That way people know where they stand and that rulebreaking poses a risk to their progrsss made by voting.
Vouch.
-
i wonder if these people think ryan is suddenly just gonna change his mind just because theres more vouches
-
Quote
↩ characterslimits Being able to help or care about other people is what makes a great admin (or mod in this case). I say, this is actually relevant because it demonstrates his ability to help others. We need more staff members who are less about just punishing rule-breakers and more about helping the members of the community, and the community itself. Thusly, I vouch.
yeah maybeso but it doesn't belong in this thread; the comments are to discuss his behaviour, nobody elses.
-
-
-
-
vouch hes racist
-
-
-
can i also say thanks for never losing your shit cuz fr if i was treated the way you guys were i would've by now
-
rylie eat my ass and say you love me
vouch, competent and capable of doing this
-
i have changed to an objection. user can be condescending, rude, and stubborn. i don't like the idea of having someone on the team who keeps pinging people at 1am to try and argue with them on Discord, in this case me, despite the fact I said "its late i'm not arguing". someone who makes it a point to argue with anyone who gives criticism shouldn't be on the staff team here, hub or not.
if you think this is also me just saying this because im salty that he argued with me then like take a gander at the posts above where red made a point and the user in question decided to tell red about how red is hypocritical. just because he put it formally doesn't mean what he's doing is okay. criticism is an essential part of being staff here given how much shit they are given, and someone with the inability to take it shouldn't be staff here
for reference
here the user is saying that my vote was apparently out of spite because i don't like them despite the fact that i voted neutral, meaning that they don't see criticism as being anything but out of spite. i say this because i can tell you i do not remember interacting with this user once prior to this incident, meaning that i am not emotionally invested in my vote
same as above. user doesn't seem to understand that criticism matters even if it is only one person saying this. apparently it don't matter because it's only me with the opinionhowever the crux of my problem is here
the user seems to think that my vote/opinion and subsequently the criticism is irrational since i didn't argue on Discord overnight to defend it. it just goes to show that this user isn't suited for a staff role here given their conduct and general incompetency in the area of taking criticism.now, before you say "but luke u didnt do read!!" i don't have to fucking read cuz this isn't my application and this isn't me selling myself, it isn't my responsibility to look good or even competent, but it is yours.
i'm not gonna argue this either; reply on here or on Discord, either way it shall be ignored.
-
Quote
↩ FromTimeToTime i would appreciate your objection as more valuable feedback if that's the case. please don't vote people you don't trust into positions of power, even if it's hub mod.
i was asked an open-ended question, how i wish that interaction had gone differently. i answered and detailed why i thought that. if i were red, i'd find that much more helpful than "i'll do better next time". i found everything i said relevant to the discussion. ping me on discord
And I would appreciate that you actually respect my vote instead of telling me what/what not to think. I couldn't care less if you'd prefer a particular vote, feedback is feedback and if you think its more 'valuable' as an objection then you likely aren't actually taking it into account.
You didn't need to bring up red's actions because they aren't relevant to this application, they're his actions and not yours. Regardless of what he did, I couldn't care less, they don't belong in justification for your actions. If his actions aren't justifying your actions, why are you mentioning it?
-
Quote
↩ FromTimeToTime however i wish your response had more of those qualities too. your response "Do you get off to this lol" was not in line with the high standards you talk about holding admins to, it was a low blow and you know that. i should not have sat back and taken it, i should have pointed it out there and then. i didn't do that because i was more concerned about resolving video's problem, but in the future i don't intend to let you step on me or others without very good reason, and i encourage others to do the same. this stands entirely separate from whether my application goes through.
we could be very good friends one day. i am critical of you right now, but we have similar traits and i could use more people like you in my life. i don't agree with how i have seen you treat people here sometimes, but i can tell you have very high ambition and that you have a grand vision for the server's future which i admire. i am friendly with panther so far, but as part of my principles i keep even friends/allies in check and i expect the same of them. i would like to see a mutually friendly and respectful relationship between us, but i must first be clear that we're equals and that from day to day your position on this minecraft network should not have any bearing on our relationship, or your relationship with any of the other players here that you have a problem with. if this conversation seems to derail the thread i'm happy to continue this conversation elsewhere either in private or in public.
This is irrelevant. This is your application, not Red's. I don't see how it was necessary to write paragraphs about how what someone said is hypocritical or whatever.
Neutral (FORMERLY, SEE BELOW). I'm questioning your judgement atm.
-
why can't we have nice things?
-
worth noting that network wide this user tends to troll. just saying.
-
May I just ask this: if we don't provide this chance for gamingto12, when will we? This is the smallest bit of power they can get, ontop of that they've proven that they are capable of being friendly/mature, so I don't understand why we shouldn't give a chance based on something that happened 14 months ago..