not sure what happened but i think i lowered it
Posts by Luke
-
-
nathaniel moment
closed
-
Fredboat removed entirely
-
can confirm am luke
Added
-
If I'm being honest, saying that a vote is required on something that has always been an automatic approval (given the requirements are met) is something that Robin or Ivan would have done.
agreed.
i’ve not voted because i don’t think there should be one. declan has had some really private issues irl and I’m personally confident it wasn’t a ragequit in the traditional sense. i believe Yurni’s ban had a factor in the resignation but i’m confident that it wasn’t a proper ragequit.
-
Also, for the people objecting for Luke’s reasons - just want to put it out there that Luke didn’t actually vote
can confirm am luke
to make it clear there’s no vote from me
-
quite fascinating how he's not banned yet Yurni is.
he is?
-
I also feel the *EAO* shouldn't be the one to determine if a ban is sufficent or not given that is not their area of influence.
i do. This suggestion is for if the EBM is taking too long to make a verdict. therefore why would we go to the EBM, isn’t that just a LBR?
-
I’m suggesting we give admins the ability to LBR people up to a week using /tempban.
I’m saying this because right now we’ve had a few instances where people have been able to rejoin despite being pedophiles/predators because ‘policy is policy’. I will also make abundantly clear that nobody has supported this user staying but admins were too scared to take proper action out of fear of the consequence.
Therefore in exceptional circumstances admins should have the ability to LBR people from in game. The circumstances being:
- Active threat to the playerbase in the context of doxxing, grooming or sexual misconduct
- Alt of an already LBR’d player
- Anything else deemed exceptional by the EAO
The consequence for misusing this should be perm removal.
-
I’m sort of not willing to unban from Discord. However there are conditions to this
If Ginlang is approved for release from the server the Discord ban will remain for another month. If Ginlang is denied, I’m willing to unban. I’m willing to give a second chance, but given straight after the ban Ginlang and his friends made alts that were raiding/being dickheads.
Therefore I’m okay with Ginlang returning to one or the other but not both quite yet
-
but… why? you were clearly unhappy as admin and you’ve not exactly shown thrill to even be on TF quite a lot recently, you’ve spoke about just leaving permanently
i must just ask - this has nothing to do with rex returning in less than a week right?
even if aero did put it in a retarded way this isn’t a vote so i’m not gonna say yes/no (even if aero did vote literally straight after saying you cant..)
-
vouch for release from Discord ban after a month
Discord bans work a bit differently you don’t get unbanned unless you appeal
I’m not comfortable with allowing you to come back at all to be frank you violated TOS and i don’t see why we should excuse that
i’m setting an appeal date for two reasons: one in case time changes my mind, i wanna be firm but not a dick but also because i’m not allowed to make unappealable bans
-
i’m afraid i can’t approve this given you posted copyrighted content.
i’m obliged by procedure to set an appeal time of a month.
i’ll leave this open if there’s any exceptional reason I should approve this but for now it’s a no
-
I’m probably not meant to do this but given how quack, the banning admin has denied the appeal, given the fact that this thread probably won’t go anywhere good i’m locking it
apologies to the forum staff if i’m not meant to
-
caleb i’d call you a loser but honestly that’d be wrong cuz you’re never losing your virginity
-
lukepostor
The same what
-
-
a human being with no traces of ai
-
no
You can reappeal in a week. you got banned prior to clarification on the NSFW stuff but i still warned you not to and you continued to do it.
-
i am replying to my own thread just for one to get the ball rolling but also i think it’d be good to make clear
every decision executives make is for a reason. there has not been a time i’ve seen where an exec has done something just for the sake of doing it. i don’t think this is always communicated very well with the wider community.