Quote↩ @'Pau' that I indeed played in the server weeks ago.
this is false. you first joined yesterday.
switch to objection. i don’t trust you’re not just doing this for power. you also join literally just to be afk.
Quote↩ @'Pau' that I indeed played in the server weeks ago.
this is false. you first joined yesterday.
switch to objection. i don’t trust you’re not just doing this for power. you also join literally just to be afk.
the fact you rejoin and immediately reinstate is sort of alarm bells to me given last time we spoke you were highkey powerhungry and got very mad at me for not reccing you. i’m neutral as this was a long time ago but i just need to ensure youre not yk just going for power
Quote
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
man said we’re just like slave owners and dictators
til letting a cluster of cells die is just as bad as the slave trade
Quote↩ enchy oh come on. you have got to be fucking kidding me.
interracial marriage? no way you actually believe the supreme court justices want to ban interracial marriage. and white christian nationalism? you act like all christians hate everyone who isnt a white male. stop slandering mainstream religious beliefs and straw manning anyone who disagrees with you.
given they have openly and overtly stated their intentions to overturn case law regarding gay marriage, right to contraception and such, it is not in any way unreasonable to assume they would ban interracial marriage..
Quote
i don't get your point here
↩ MagAgentV3 what’s with the hostility?
last message in event-host discussion was the 31st of May fwiw
Quote↩ RedEastWood The high vouch percentage is required because senior admin is the highest attainable rank on the server (barring executive roles, as they are a separate branch of power). I would expect someone who has the highest rank of power to have a certain level of public approval at the time of their application. I understand that as times change, sentiment may change (which is perhaps a separate discussion); but at the time of the application the applicant should have widespread public support.
you seem to think i’m against a high percentage, i’m not. i’m against it being 90% because it’s so ridiculously high. i do believe 1 object for every 10 vouches is unfair given the amount of people who actually vote. telesphoero only had about 9 people cast votes that isn’t neutral which means the margin for 90% is a lot lower. it’s difficult to rely on people to vote given how increasingly inactive people are.
Quote↩ RedEastWood If he is popular and has public approval, it would not be difficult to achieve these three vouches.
I’m sorry, is 88% unpopular? (8 vouches with justification 1 objection from someone who isn’t banned)
this is the point i’m making. all it takes is one single person to override everyone else. all it takes is a person and their buddy to override 18 other people. all it’d take to override a voterbase of 50 vouches would be bobpop’s retarded gang.
i believe 80% would be fairer while still maintaining the high standards expected from SrA
↩ RedEastWood then 7-1 vouch-object is still ridiculous. all it takes is one person to veto an entire application..?
also only one vote was done without justification
↩ videogamesm12 then y was his vote taken fully into account for telesphoero’s vote given he’s been banned for like a year now and it threw off the application entirely
@"glaucus atlanticus"#641
Rules broken - he’s shdwo, a bypasser
proof - discord mods can attest that he is the same person as he joined a voicechat and sounded exactly the same as shdwo, and caleb in particular has recordings to support this
he has also been banned from discord for a while now due to this revelation
and i gotta ask the forum mod who is also a discord mods (@"videogamesm12"#4) why he was allowed for so long when you guys fully knew who he was given you were the ones who actually made the ban..?
↩ volleo6144 yeah but like telesphoero got 8 vouches and 2 objections can you explain to me how exactly that’s ‘truly conflicted’? One of the users wasn’t even a user on the server and is a notorious bypasser that hasn’t been banned for some reason
it just feels unfair. all it takes is two people to object and that’s enough for a denial.
also change the threshold 90% is fucking ridiculous
i dont get it flarum is fucked anyway
looks like im getting banned for calling people retarded its been fun yall
i have shit my pants
love how midway you just gave up changing the copypaste