Posts by Fleek

Blocked in TFM - if you want it to be unblocked then you’ll need to create a new thread in suggestion.

@DragonSlayer2189#15737 Both.

As some of you may know, we are planning to rewrite TFGuilds - I want to get people's suggestions on how we can improve TFGuilds.

With the rewrite, a lot of things will change but the data will and should not be impacted (we will be changing how we store the data though).

@Ashaz#15676 That’s because there are a few people fixing or cleaning things up so it would look nice, I have done that a few times before.

I object.

I object - purely for administrative purposes. If an admin doesn't leave if you ask them to then report them - this I would believe is in breach of Category 3, Section C (being nuisance).

@Folfy_Blue#15625 It does not need to be changed. It really comes down to common sense.

/ro can be restricted to a player if you specified the player - /ro [player] - if you don’t specify the player then it will be global.

Especially if you’re globally blocking commands/pvp/edits, that’s a massive data (depending on the amount of players) to put into a file.

@wild1145#15398 See Dragon's post. It’s hardcoded but I think it should be configurable.

Noah Before I proceed any further with my decision, can you elaborate on what doesn’t work with dispensers? I don’t want to approve or deny bug reports or suggestions (honestly this should belong to bug reports with title name change) that doesn’t have enough information.

Given there aren't any more reports and I have pinpointed to few places of causes - this can now be closed.

@StevenNL2000#15352 I can make it run on a schedule - it won't be a plugin though.

I can write up some code to check for exploits in schematics when uploading via HTTPD. But for existing schematics, a program or command line will be needed to create (I can do it with existing NBT libraries available) to go through all schematics and remove any suspicious ones.

While this is a good idea, it won't be something that we will focus on - our main priority is utilising stuff for the network (F01 and F02).

To be honest, I think suggestions like this that do not impact the community should be discussed between developers and Ryan.

@Ashaz#15285 Correct.

if you’re trying to use TNT via dispensers, it won’t work.

Quote

@wild1145#15159 helping prioritise new feature suggestions

Anything relating to development that would improve player experience should be either left to Ryan and me or be discussed with us before approval - it will require scoping and a ticket.

@StevenNL2000#15248 I vouch for this.

Are you proposing something like username#0000?

I object, I don’t like going through the forum for threads I want to read because it got buried by S&D threads.

Quote

@Tizz#15082 If VulnerabilityPatcher gets configured to a satisfactory level so that OPs can also paste NBT without crashing the server I'll be glad to ditch this suggestion as it will be pointless.

VulnerabilityPatcher can’t check for WorldEdit, and if it could, it is most likely going to slow down to check each block in large edits.
WorldEdit doesn’t offer any API that we could use.