Quote
Posts by enchy
Please Note: The TotalFreedom Forum has now been put into a read-only mode. Total Freedom has now closed down and will not be returning in any way, shape or form. It has been a pleasure to lead this community and I wish you all the best for your futures.
-
-
happy birthday 🎉
-
-
↩ @SaturnRayo oh im talking about saturnturn
of fanfic fame
-
-
quoted from this cnn article
QuoteLast month, Biden hinted he was considering taking executive action, telling Jimmy Kimmel that while he believed Congress should codify Roe, "There's some executive orders I could employ, we believe -- we're looking at that right now."
and later in the article
Quotewho the White House says will provide "technical assistance to states affording legal protection to out-of-state patients as well as providers who offer legal reproductive health care."
seems to me like biden is just trying to use executive orders to circumvent the legislature, judicial branch, and the authority of states. how is this not breaking every check and balance we have.
QuoteBut Biden said recently he would support making an exception to the filibuster -- the 60-vote threshold in the Senate needed to pass most legislation -- in order to codify abortion rights and the right to privacy through legislation passed by Congress. The President had previously been reluctant to support changing the Senate's rules in order to pass his agenda.
so hes willing to completely change how the senate works just to pass his agenda. pretty unconstitutional, and also it will set a precedent for anyone after biden to just change how systems of government work in order to get what they want
its also interesting to me that when trump uses executive orders, this other cnn article only talk about what critics say and how critics say that its bad. but when biden wants to use an executive order to circumvent the judicial and legislative branch, and even considers changing how the legislative branch works, the article doesnt mention a single critic at all
-
i type with my toes
-
-
↩ Feueristic that huge statue of kim jong un in north korea.
-
-
↩ @' 5 ' which is?
-
i thought he was gonna be based but after failing to free northern ireland there was no reason for him to stay in office
-
-
↩ Zarcana should have enders as like a futuristic city setting, and could have imperium be explored as like an ancient empire territory.
video and lyicx: back to the future maybe?
lyicx travels across time to make sure video and saturn dont break up and give birth to alco, who ends up stopping the raids in the future. also miwo is the old scientist guy
-
for the admin chat leak, it doesnt seem like there were any ill intentions or any real harm done.
as for the may 15 thing, ill wait for the people who you apologized to vote. im leaning towards vouch but i want to get their opinion to get a better understanding of what happened before i vote
neutral for now
edit: after reading other people’s posts, object
-
Quote
couldve made it more clear that it was a hypothetical situation, my bad
-
-
Quote
theyre not real, its a hypothetical situation
Quoteexamples for what?
Quote↩ erin I mean.. the problem I see with that analogy is that if there were 1000 identical houses and one of them randomly failed structurally, there’s a good chance that the rest of the houses would be evacuated to work out the cause of the fault before more people are hurt or property is damaged. A similar stance, albeit in a more extreme case, is that often thousands of aircraft are grounded if there’s reasonable cause that a mechanical fault caused just one crash in that model.
youre 100% right, i think i said i know that 1 out of 1000 is huge for houses but just to roll with the analogy. i was kinda rushing and couldnt think of a better analogy
-
vouch, incredibly capable and dependable. hes proven his abilities as an admin, senior admin, and executive. no reason not to reinstate him
plus as a bonus hes racist
-
↩ Luke the point is that the overall pattern of the neighborhood (metaphor for society) is that the houses work in almost all cases. however, by using anecdotal evidence (like billy’s house) to describe the entire neighborhood, you create a description contrary to the actual neighborhood: that the houses suck.
in a more real example: lets say there a 3 people i know. they have an american flag on their houses, and as some random people walk by, they throw eggs at their houses and the flag. now, i could look at anecdotal evidence and say “wow our country hates the american flag, what happened to patriotism?” or i could step back and look at the larger picture: “this only happened 3 times, theres bound to be a few idiots in a huge country.”
the point of these examples is that by using anecdotal evidence you dont capture an honest picture of society, the only way to do that is by looking at larger trends and patterns. focusing on the outliers and anecdotes only creates a skewed view of reality