Posts by enchy

  • Miasmus

    first rule of school accounts: dont link it to a place anything like here (general sources of fuckery)
    second rule of school accounts: expect everything you do is being traced

  • OP DUPE

    you realize that there are kits, on tf, that if you wear it and someone sees you take damage, your game crashes
    do you seriously want to try to moderate an event like that

  • the totalfreedom playlist

    journey - separate ways
    ozzy osbourne - crazy train
    skeggs - stop
    wolfi - misleading
    beach house - space song
    prompto - ed edd n eddy
    masn - hate me
    $uicideboy$ - ...and to those i love thanks for sticking around
    xxxtentacion - moonlight
    convolk - lonewolf
    pharmacist - north memphis
    literally the entire soundtrack of legend of zelda - twilight princess


    get ready for wave of josh a
    all of these except for pain is from the disgrace album, its pretty good


    josh a - pain
    josh a - disgrace
    josh a - paranoia
    josh a - suicidal benz
    josh a - i miss my ex


    and now for the memes


    afroman - because i got high
    coolio - gangsta's paradise
    rick astley - never gonna give you up


    i have a chaotic music taste i know
    edit: still woozy - lucy

  • Zarcana's Admin Application

    I've been waiting to vote, partially because I'm not sure I was decided enough, but I think now I am after rereading most of the replies. Here are my opinions on this application:

    1. Some people are questioning whether or not Zarcana's judgement would be affected by his participation in the Enders guild

    UnderTails and I, in our times as guild leaders, have had no qualms with asking for bans of our own members, we have done so in the past with griefers, and I see no reason why Zarcana won't act similarly. If I were them then I would want disruptive members out of my guild and banned.

    1. Zarcana responded to said questioning with the procedure he would use to make judgements

    Zarcana's answer is somehow "what we want to hear." Well, aren't admin applications SUPPOSED to be what you want to hear? I would assume you want to hear that an applicant will follow the rules and act responsibly. Is Zarcana supposed to give a wrong answer? I would view this as a plus since Zarcana is listing the proper protocol he would use to make the right decision and deliver a sanction or pass on punishment, clearly showing he intends to follow admin procedure.

    1. Zarcana doesn't have enough experience

    The only way to gain experience is by doing something. It's bullshit to assume that applicants should know everything to do in every situation before even becoming admin, there are other admins that could help/train Zarcana, should they become admin.


    In short, the objections that I've seen seem to have some assumptions and judgements I believe are unfair or just flat out incorrect. I'm not an admin so I guess I don't have full knowledge on some of my arguments but other admins have seemed to say what I've summed up here.


    vouch