Posts by elmon

    Quote

    @Luke#11717 What's the point in inactivity removals if the EAO can just indefinitely suspend people for not doing their job?

    Because you weren't removed simply for inactivity? I'm pretty sure that was made pretty clear already I don't have to repeat what myself and fionn have already said.

    Quote

    @Luke#11717 I have to work from admin again according to @fionn and I also have to go through another lengthy process just to be able to reach that point for something I feel is unfair.

    That I wasn't aware of but regardless, you weren't doing your job so frankly you get what you get. You clearly had a no-fucks-given attitude towards TotalFreedom as a whole so I don't know why do you expect to be entitled to your position

    Quote

    @Luke#11717 Quite frankly I'd have preferred to just been suspended for 3 months or whatever because what I did didn't warrant an indefinite suspension and it seems to me I only got the indefinite sentence out of spite because I said you couldn't

    The indefinite sentence is given because the attitude you had was pretty persistent so we had no way of knowing how long it would take for that to change. If it has changed since then, then great and I hope your journey back to Senior is quick.

    @Luke#11715 Would you have preferred to have been removed entirely? I don't understand your point... The punishment is up to the discretion of the admin officer and the way I see it this is better for you as you actually retain your Senior Admin status (albeit suspended)

    @Ashaz#11710 The admin officer reserves the right to suspend someone they don't believe is adequately fulfilling their duties as an admin, and in Luke's case he had a general disregard for actually administrating and his attitude at the time was not that of what is expected of a senior admin.


    An admin doesn't have to be in direct breach of the conduct policy to be suspended; consider a job situation, gross misconduct is only one of many reasons you can be fired. If you are in breach of contract in any way (including not doing your job) you will be fired.

    Quote

    @videogamesm12#11439 Sometime later they were indefinitely banned for reasons I cannot remember.

    He was suspended at the time and went on the server and griefed an lgbt banner, after i gave him a 24 hour ban he went on to rage on the forums shoutbox.


    I will put some faith in you and hope you changed, i’ll vouch for your unban.

    @wild1145#11139 This definitely seems like a TFM implementation, at least it would make a lot more sense. TFM already has the bot token in it's config for things like role sync, and the account links between discord/minecraft are also tfm-side.

    Quote

    @videogamesm12#11113 The bot checks for ranks via a role check. It doesn't verify if the person with the role has a rank in-game. In other words, it asks "do they have it?" but not "are they supposed to have it?". If something were to happen where another bot (one which is backdoored) gave everyone the Senior role, uh oh. Now everyone has console-level access to the server.

    The only bots that can give someone roles are Kero, the TF bot excluding smp and gmod, and Ryan’s bot. If a hacker is sophisticated enough to gain unauthorised access to any of those and has motive to cause harm to TF then the discord bot is the least of our worries.

    @redeastwood#11066 You seem to be misunderstanding. Video stated the bot was a security issue, and I was asking how a panel is more secure. I never stated the bot was perfectly functioning (most of which is out of my control). I was merely asking video to expand on his point about it being a security threat.

    Quote

    @videogamesm12#11061 security concerns of using a Discord bot to control the entire Minecraft server

    Can you elaborate on this? If anything i’d argue the bot is more secure than giving everyone panel access (not that i’m against it)