Posts by volleo6144
-
-
-
-
-
vouch because there's no way "French Republic" was the last time @"cubed"#340 is going to decide to rename our guild also because typos
-
Quote
April 13
...it's actually late February; object as, while it's been five-and-a-half months, it seems like absolutely nothing has changed
-
ok but who's the blank square the template had three of them
-
â €
-
vouch as /setplayerlimit is a confusing name (and no, "why would anyone think that's what it meant" isn't a good excuse) and lots of other commands already work like this
-
↩ StevenNL2000 ...assuming it doesn't outright kick everyone from there being too many entity names.
-
↩ enchy yup, which is also why giving up the fight over grammatical correctness in places that don't necessarily require it is a good idea (seriously, if it's still understandable, it's fine)
just like the equivalent situation over the word "literally"
-
vouch, see ↩ videogamesm12's post—the original cause was an honest mistake that so many people ridiculed you for with such... uh, force?... that, as with when you were originally appointed to admin, I can't in good faith judge anything based on your response to it.
-
Well, it's... an interesting change, and I'm not sure if we'll accidentally remove so many admins with August's activity check that we have to pause future checks again.
Discord link to the discussion in adminchat of the activity index that led to 3.00 originally being set to 1.5 hours
However, I'm... not sure how I feel about using the activity index for this. Hear me out...
For whatever reason, Plan, instead of totaling the last 3 weeks and calculating the activity index based on the total divided by 3, calculates the activity index for each of the last 3 weeks individually and then averages those.
With the way the activity index works (you can get closer and closer to 5.00, but you can never quite reach it, and the derivative of the function at zero playtime is 5 for just 2 hours), this means that 0+0+24 hours is (0+0+4.62)/3 = 1.54 while 0+2+2 is (0+2.5+2.5)/3 = 1.67.
Reaching 3.00 with evenly-balanced weeks only takes 3+3+3 hours, while missing a week completely for some reason means you have to get 18+18 in the other two to get to 3.00...
-
(note: this was a blank post until 17 days after it was posted, as a joke in reference to OP being cut off after "the only questions I can't answer are")
-
vouch: it's been 3¼ months since your last message (2021-04-08 11:20:16.667 UTC) well, unless alts, and neither 2b nor 2g was listed (even then I would probably go neutral, which says a lot about how I feel towards indefbans in general)
-
vouch, I noticed that the weird chat thing happens when you try but I didn't know it didn't work at all
-
The blank square is the most problematic as it doesn't provide any distinction (well, besides the presence or absence of the VS16 thing) between emojis that aren't already in Minecraft's font, especially because these emojis are often in messages that literally only include them.
-
Vouch—there's nothing that's already just "expires in 3-6-12 months", and if there's nothing between day bans and indefinite bans, then it makes no sense to have indefinite bans in the first place. With the exception of things that would get people on the unappealable ban list anyway, I can't think of anything that it would be truly problematic to convert indefinite bans to multi-month bans for—what, if they do it again, they'll get banned for another few months.
I should have been more patient, not less, in my only objection to an indefban appeal in the last six months.
-
also M1 / 16GB, which is ... a MacBook capable of running Minecraft with all* graphics settings at max and usually keeping above 60fps
also why does flarum not let you paste images from clipboard
-
↩ @'fndndjdnsnsn' ok but how old were you when you came up with a username like that
