Please Note: The TotalFreedom Forum has now been put into a read-only mode. Total Freedom has now closed down and will not be returning in any way, shape or form. It has been a pleasure to lead this community and I wish you all the best for your futures.
-
Quote
↩ lyicx ill see if i can look into this proposition. currently its a duo between myself and shyrix when she's on. but some event hosts play and ideally i dont want event hosts having op or anything outside of moderation actions if they're actively participating as a normal player. unfortunately having permission nodes aint an option at the moment
I didn't mean it as if you're event host, you have to enforce the rules. I'm just stating that we need someone present that can enforce rules at the very least, because if you leave us alone, people are prone to break rules.
-
Feedback from my POV (Based on MiniSMP ran on 31st August):
- It is alright to give people items, provided they're not OP.
- People complaining makes the event less fun.
- Event Hosts are required to enforce rules while an event is running.
- People repeatedly rushing you with no items isn't fun.
- People repeatedly killing you isn't fun.
- Random items kind of ruin the event as a whole.
Overall, the event was fine I guess. It could've gone better but a lot of it was out of your control and you tried your best with this one I think Lyicx. I also know some of my complaints are unreasonable, considering MiniSMP is Semi-Anarchy, but I feel like this only contributes to the problem, as it just makes people a lot more prone to be annoying to each other, which then begins the complaining.
-
My entire collection of 450+ non-functional pens.
-
Quote
↩ Miasmus Since no one here is a judge, who can decide if I reallly broke the law? Copyright isn't exactly black and white, and until thats decided, the ban seems unjustified if the only reasoning is that a moderator thinks I broke the law.
Bans for breaking the law are usually subjective anyway. It's so that we're not liable in the case you have broken the law.
-
↩ DragonSlayer2189 Besides the fact Miasmus has been punished before for this, and got an unban. And it was made clear they'd be more serious with issues like this going forwards.
-
Quote
↩ Miasmus Additionally, considering that most youtube videos with copyrighted content use entertainment to justify fair use, and they aren't removed, I'd think entertainment is valid.
That's different. That is an example of a derivative work, whereas posting copyrighted content alone is not. "Entertainment" is and never has been a valid clause of fair use.
-
↩ Miasmus Speeding up something doesn't require a lot of effort. It doesn't change any of the content in a transformative way, and there is nothing to make it considered derivative (which is allowed). The factor it's sped up by doesn't play a factor.
-
In my opinion, fair use cannot be applied here. Speeding up something isn't significant enough to make it respect copyright laws suddenly.
-
↩ enchy Mission failed. We'll get 'em next time.
-
Quote
↩ @'aeluraydakx4' i am fucking sick to death...
...of fndndjdnsnsn and fuckin Flobbier saying Amng Us in my pristine #ward. i cant fucking hire enough janitors to clean up their filthy amng us famine.
this is a call to arms sponsored by the anti among us association to fucking rid these lads from our gracious ward
i am genuinely offering 1k next month to everyone who is mentally unstable at that time on the condition we beat these guys
@"fndndjdnsnsn"#360 @"Flobbier"#408 Hey look, it's you guys!
-
Considering how much of a nightmare it can be to keep on track of active crash exploits as it is, this would just make it even harder. It was removed for a reason. It should stay removed for that reason. Object.
-
-
↩ Alco_Rs11 The name 'Cadges' is also owned by a spambotter. It sucks how many belong to hacked accounts.
ONT: Vouch.
-
-
I noticed this while I was flying around. Got Coco's attention when they came on. I'm going to have to Object for the same reason.
-
↩ erin This is cap and you know it.
ONT: Vouch.
-
Protector of bunnies becomes assistant admin officer. o_O
-
↩ Darth I think the main intent is to discourage people from engaging in the content. If there's less people looking for that content, producers will eventually slow down on production. It's not always that simple however. It's a step in the right direction however.
-
-
Objecting based on the above.