Posts by Caleb

Quote

↩  Miasmus Additionally, considering that most youtube videos with copyrighted content use entertainment to justify fair use, and they aren't removed, I'd think entertainment is valid.

That's different. That is an example of a derivative work, whereas posting copyrighted content alone is not. "Entertainment" is and never has been a valid clause of fair use.

↩  Miasmus Speeding up something doesn't require a lot of effort. It doesn't change any of the content in a transformative way, and there is nothing to make it considered derivative (which is allowed). The factor it's sped up by doesn't play a factor.

In my opinion, fair use cannot be applied here. Speeding up something isn't significant enough to make it respect copyright laws suddenly.

↩  enchy Mission failed. We'll get 'em next time.

Quote

↩ @'aeluraydakx4' i am fucking sick to death...

...of fndndjdnsnsn and fuckin Flobbier saying Amng Us in my pristine #ward. i cant fucking hire enough janitors to clean up their filthy amng us famine.

this is a call to arms sponsored by the anti among us association to fucking rid these lads from our gracious ward

i am genuinely offering 1k next month to everyone who is mentally unstable at that time on the condition we beat these guys

Display More

@"fndndjdnsnsn"#360 @"Flobbier"#408 Hey look, it's you guys!

Considering how much of a nightmare it can be to keep on track of active crash exploits as it is, this would just make it even harder. It was removed for a reason. It should stay removed for that reason. Object.

Object

kanst

I noticed this while I was flying around. Got Coco's attention when they came on. I'm going to have to Object for the same reason.

↩  erin This is cap and you know it.

ONT: Vouch.

Protector of bunnies becomes assistant admin officer. o_O

↩  Darth I think the main intent is to discourage people from engaging in the content. If there's less people looking for that content, producers will eventually slow down on production. It's not always that simple however. It's a step in the right direction however.

bump

Objecting based on the above.

https://forum.totalfreedom.me/…orly-aged-things-round-2/

Object.

I am British. Despite this, kanst has done nothing wrong.

Have a good time in whatever you end up doing. Hope to see you again some time, you seemed chill in the small amount of time I saw you.

It is legal, but only in my basement.

While this is a gray area. (Considering it breaks Discord Community Guideline #17, therefore breaking rule 1a in the discord.), it doesn't seem fair for us to push double standards on people. Multiple people have previous posted or streamed content in the same manner that breaks the ToS, and yet they are still allowed in the discord. I'd like to see an input from some of the Discord mods before I pass a vote however.

I don't think attacking people helps matters, shdwo.