Posts by man
-
-
In light of recent events, I have made the decision to indefinitely ban matscalle from the events server, as well as future events. I have spoken with the ECM on this matter and we have both agreed that this is the right decision to make. This thread has been made to document this ban.
-
Although it may not seem like it, a lot of us really do appreciate your work, and the effort you put into this event. It’s sad that some don’t see it but I want you to know we do appreciate you and your efforts.
For transparency, I have offered Lyicx my help for today’s plans, in which I can host an event if the MiniSMP does not continue.
-
-
Object.
The applicant should not be allowed in any leadership role until they make a major change in their skillset, their emotional control and their conscience.
Edit: The applicant has made the choice to leave the community.
-
Just a small notice that in a few hours time, this application will have been open for 2 months.
-
Respectfully, the applicant's incapacity to manage their own emotions when things don't go their way is a major reason for not giving them this role. To be in this role, you need to be a good team member. You need to listen, both to your fellows and to your team leader. You need to be able to keep a calm when things go out of control. The actions I and others witnessed today have proved that the applicant is not fit for this role.
-
Quote
↩ lyicx Day 2: (Subject to change, im waiting for a response) i will leave @matscalle in charge. i wanna see if he is able to handle hosting an event aswell as assisting for the prep (this is where that application comes into play)
Is there any change to this plan?
-
Whilst the chaos was ensuing in the chat, I took some time and proceeded to look into who actually placed the lava, and it indeed proved to be Rex.
My client logs list as follows:
Code[19:37:12] [Render thread/INFO]: [CHAT] §f----- CoreProtect §f----- (x50/y4/z-2) [19:37:12] [Render thread/INFO]: [CHAT] 2.80/m ago §f- Feueristic§f placed water§f. [19:37:12] [Render thread/INFO]: [CHAT] 3.57/m ago §f- Feueristic§f placed water§f. [19:37:12] [Render thread/INFO]: [CHAT] 11.52/m ago §f- RexousLad§f placed lava§f. [19:37:12] [Render thread/INFO]: [CHAT] 37.03/m ago §f- JCTheLetter§f broke oak_fence§f. [19:37:12] [Render thread/INFO]: [CHAT] 37.12/m ago §f- JCTheLetter§f placed oak_fence§f.As you can see, about 11-12 minutes before this log being taken, lava was placed by Rex. This corresponds with the messages sent into the chat at around 7:26PM GMT, with questions as to who placed the lava.
Therefore, it was indeed Rex who placed the lava and not matscalle. However, my notes about matscalle causing drama in my objection are true.
-
I thought you were MB? Or is that enchy?
Vouch regardless
-
I object.
At today's event, which the applicant is to take over tomorrow, the applicant and another player proceeded to instigate arguments between the two sides of the map - the 'Rich' side and the 'Poor' side. The applicant was on the 'Rich' side. The arguments further lead to the two sides fighting, instead of the peace being maintained. The behaviour portrayed by the applicant has now lead me, and many of today's players, to assume that the applicant is not fit for leadership.
The applicant should not be allowed to host their part of the 3 day event tomorrow. As for their sanction, they have been banned for a week from the events server. Further sanctions may be handed out.
The event overall went well, but the applicant's actions caused it to end dramatically and ultimately lead to the event stopping.
-
-
-
I played Among Us with family and friends a few weeks back and honestly it is not as fun as it used to be. I know some may object due to all of the among us jokes, but for me the game is not fun anymore. Therefore, I object.
-
Vouch.
-
Quote
↩ Deauthorized It would certainly be a better solution than just preventing all logins to the freedom-01 server in the event of a bot attack
In the last few months of being admin, I've never seen a moment where we've prevented all logins in the event of a spambot attack.
Neutral.
-
happy birthday
-
-
-
i don’t really know you well but from our interactions you seem like a trustworthy person