I feel like this is recent enough to warrant concern
Posts by erin
-
-
↩ @'kanst' thighs
-
↩ @'Ryan' it's mostly used to destroy blocks near a particular player, the all players feature isn't really used at least from what I've seen. (I forgot it was the main feature until your reply)
I would rather not have a -s tag usable for anything but removing blocks near the person typing the command
-
↩ @'Ryan' with a maximum radius of 50, /ro often needs to be sent more than once. It sends 3 lines of chat to every single player online every time it is activated which can get very spammy.
-
Quote
She would have been reinstated instantly after the 2 week period, but she left the server and forum and so that's why I think this goes down as activity.
I object, the above reasons summarise exactly what I want to say. Maturity is questionable at best.
-
-
Vouch but be aware that kanst's influence is bad
-
↩ videogamesm12 there is bias and corruption within the admin officer team
-
↩ videogamesm12 start by removing kanst
-
-
Definitely not allowed but if you report and get the bot taken down they'll probably just put another one back up. Discords security system and punishment system is one of the worst I've seen.
-
Ouch
-
-
Is our ECM making biased threads?
-
They're already punishable under rule 3c - being a nuisance to other players.
Edit: admins also have discretion to remove disruptive things near spawn, these are included in that.
-
Object because of that one username.
jk vouch
-
I object because kanst hates amogus and if he was demoted I couldn't smite him
-
So you don't have any punishments on record, and I double checked and kanst banned a player for "greifing in fornt of me".
This person had a similar IP range to you, with the first 2 numbers of their IP resembling yours, so you were caught up in the action.
Apologies for the inconvenience but I've since unbanned you.
-
-
While you haven't followed the ban appeal format I'm bored so I'll investigate to see what was going on.