Posts by erin

  • Flobbier - Ban Appeal

    Switching to object. The person afflicted is clearly unhappy with the ban being lifted at such an early time considering the mental and emotional stress caused.


    Quite frankly in a case like this I find it absolutely appalling that individuals are arguing against the individual harassed not wanting their harasser to return so soon.


    ↩  ThePyroManActualAccount did you read any of the rest of his post?

  • matscalle event host application

    I was initially going to vouch but it's been a busy day. I gave you the benefit of the doubt even after sending the link in server chat multiple times. My main concern was maybe not your willingness to have people cast their votes, it was moreso the stubbornness when you were told off in chat for this multiple times, it was also brought up in this thread you were so willing to share, and yet you still continued to spam the link and ask for vouches.


    I like your mentality and drive for helping the server, but I feel your impatience has been rather misdirected on this occasion and I have to object I'm afraid.

  • Name Change

    ↩ @'Freenom' just general discussion or something? idk. admins are advised to post name changes here on occasion so people know who they are when they see a new username as an admin. but we don't need to, and neither do ops.

  • Anarchy Server - Approval poll

    Quote

    ↩ @'Panther' Again, the “staff and players’ attitude” isn’t going to convince anyone to stay online longer

    Are you sure about that? We have quite a lot of players who welcome new players by telling them how they'll be punished if they break the rules as the first thing they say to them. Now, while it's important to explain to players that we have rules, it's a poor mentality.


    There's also a general mentality which I am maybe not immune from, where we automatically assume new players who join not long after a ban are bypassers. Or that people who talk a little bit funny are bypassers. I've seen you yourself accuse a player of being a ban bypasser and try to interrogate him or something despite others explaining evidence to the contrary.


    Simply not doing that will make players stick around longer. Treating new players with respect and bringing them into the conversation and making them feel welcome does not require developer effort, or cost anything, but goes a big way in keeping them on the server, rather than just welcoming them with the same pasted message and not interacting any further until the rules are broken.

  • Cafe72 ban appeal

    ↩  Cafe72 look at the facts here.. you added yourself to the admin list as "hackedlol" then not only banned another player online but repeated the command 4 times. You don't do that by accidentally turning on hack modules, especially as forceop requires some setup.


    Need I remind you the burden of proof is on you here for this story. Logs and evidence which got you banned show something differently. You have to actually prove yourself if you're doubling down here rather than just doubling down.

  • Cafe72 ban appeal

    Here's your original ban appeal


    Going to quote from video here on it

    That's not forceop. What forceop in Wurst does, is that on cracked servers you log in as an admin (since it's cracked you just know the opped players name), and try and crack their /login password by bruteforcing it. That is not able to be done here as we use discord verification, and a different command to add players to saconfig.


    It's been long enough since your ban that a vouch might be in order had you actually told the truth and taken accountability rather than lying about how you accidentally pressed a button which gave you admin access before you went on to ban a random innocent player. God I hate when pressing a button by accident does that.


    Object.

  • Flobbier - Ban Appeal

    Please follow the correct format


    It's only really been a month but I appreciate the sincerity. I would like to make it clear though, this isn't the first times one of your jokes has gone too far and landed you in hot water. I'm not asking you to cut out the among us stuff for my vouch, but just please ensure that your jokes don't go too far in future.


    Vouch for now.


    Retracting my vote for the time being


    ↩  NotPetya that was as best as I can recall and isn't a definitive statement. It may be wrong.

  • Anarchy Server - Approval poll

    My main concern with this idea is nothing to do with the actual idea of anarchy, it's more the way you're approaching it. It's the only thing you're actually trying to do and I haven't seen you take any steps to improve the retention or market the server in any other way. It makes me fear that if this were to become a thing you would focus entirely on the anarchy gamemode and allow the freedom server to just fizzle away. I'd be more willing to see an anarchy server had you put more, or any effort into at least trying to improve the freedom servers retention rather than disregarding it altogether. Who knows? You might manage to bring the player count up to a level that makes a separate anarchy server more viable.


    There's also a few other secondary issues I have, such as with the nature of this communitys policies we can't offer true anarchy, and the fact that the players indefinitely banned for serious exploits will just go to the creative anarchy server and crash that.


    Please don't put all of your cards on the table.