Posts by erin

Tempted to object because Chelsea fan but vouch. It's been a while and if you have truly made amends with Ryan then that solves the only issue o may have.

↩  Rex2LostOldAccount I booked the weekend off to watch a local football derby, Glenavon vs Portadown which just happened to coincide.

happy birthday op

↩ @'Ryan' on anarchy servers, 2b in particular, people rename withers to advertise their discord or send a message or something. The boss bar shows whatever they want to say, which shows up to all players in range.

I am really looking forward to this. Good on you - this is a really interesting and rather original idea.

↩ @'smugd' your comment probably got removed because it didn't add any comments or reasoning to explain why you vouched, which is what Lyicx has asked for.

After some thought I've decided to object, mainly due to this

Quote

↩  Luke your attitude is literally the same as it was then

You abused what little power and responsibility you were bestowed with on multiple occasions, including right after you were told by a discord mod you'd get banned if you did it again.

Sure, event hosts can no longer mute people on the discord. But by default in events, you'll be given the permission to kick, mute and ban players. I just can't trust you with any moderation abilities whatsoever given that your attitudes the same as the one that got you removed in the first place.

Think this sums up my stance quite well.

Nah but really tho, I don't see why I should care about which gender people are attracted to or which gender people feel more comfortable presenting as. It doesn't affect me so why the fuck should I care. Do your thing and let people do theirs.

Vouch for a general sanction, I have no thoughts on the length, just something.

↩  ThePyroManActualAccount yeah, we're aware of the several ways of finding out whether or not a vanished player is online.

The thing is, the full vanish would mean that op vanish and admin vanish would be identical (aside from admins being able to see vanished ops), so when that's patched for admins, it will do the same for op vanish and they would be undetectable by other ops (unless they break blocks or chat)

A partial vanish would solve this issue as it keeps the op vanish separate from the admin version.

erinstatue

Quote

! Jokes aside the Imperium area is fucking amazing

Fwiw the partial vanish described here is already possible. Disguising as an invisible entity (albeit currently disabled while the plugin is patched) does exactly what it says on the tin - hiding the player from sight and from the tab but keeping them accessible everywhere else.

Since this has already been a thing that players often do, I don't have any issues with what's described in the partial setting. I believe it's a nice balance of a player seeming offline but being accessible if they need to be accessed. And bringing it into the /vanish command will make it more accessible to all players, rather than just the select few who know the long command for disguising as an invisible entity.

Quote

↩ @'kanst' you’ve been trying to appeal your ban for like a year now lol

I haven't counted but those are mainly for several different bans.

And now onto my main point. I vouch for you this time, since none of your behaviour seriously concerns me. But you're severely risking your entire status on the discord. As FTTT put it, just remember to think a little before sending messages. I don't feel you'll be given too many chances.

↩  Tizz there was also a clause to this at the time that you were exempt from that rule if you didn't use the resources, and reported them instead.

It's got 5 million downloads on Google play., and that github link seems to be the official one.

I have used it, and it does work but I will say that even on my pretty powerful phone it is a serious battery drain and a rather serious heat concern. It's a fun gimmick and has a nice novelty but I don't believe it's an actual way to play Minecraft. It just puts too much strain on your device.

↩  Ivan I think it's sarcasm dw.

Quote

↩  Flobbier Again, most likely not true.

Most likely not true? Evidence please. This isn't his word against ours. It's his word against strong and clear evidence that his account issued punishment commands.

Quote

↩  Flobbier It definitely helps prove that he’s not dishonest.

So basically.. what you're saying is that it's impossible that he's sticking to his original story for continuity, and that he must be telling the truth? So in other words if I insist that I'm the rightful heir to the throne over and over again, I will eventually rule the land since I couldn't possibly be lying?

Quote

↩  Flobbier I personally believe that the hacks which he had on did something without him knowing.

The commands he was using were plugin specific. And even in the incredibly unlikely scenario there's some kind of hacked client that can send networkmanager punishments, what happens on his account is his responsibility. He also hasn't once brought up this story himself so even if it's true he's been lying at some point.

Quote

↩  Flobbier I just think that saying he deliberately harmed the server is false.

He both kicked and banned players from the network for the fun of it using a permission he was never meant to have..

Quote

↩  Flobbier he’s firm that he did not do anything is not typical behavior for someone who is lying.

It's hard to read into the psychology of what someone is saying over the internet - the fact he is adamant he didn't do it doesn't indicate anything either way. Looking at the evidence, I'm deducing that he's lying because he has yet to provide anything in the way of evidence that he didn't do it, yet there's lots of evidence that says he did.

Quote

↩  Flobbier so either he is lying or there is some truth in what he’s saying

Well as was tagged by alco earlier in the thread, Ryan made it very clear that the ban was completely valid.. As the person who initially gtfoed him from the server, I remember asking for like a triple confirmation that there was absolutely no doubt he was the one doing it. I got that confirmation from Ryan himself and he was banned.

So he's lying. It's his word against a plethora of irrefutable evidence..

Quote

↩  batchest i was falsely banned

Object your ban was valid, Ryan was able to back it up with logs and with his experience with dealing with server logs he made it abundantly clear that there was no way anyone aside from you could have sent the commands.

You were told to tell the truth on your appeal and you didn't which is my reason for objecting

Quote

↩ @' 5 ' you are remembered for spamming, trolling, harassing/bullying without provocation

Yeah fwiw you were close to being indefinitely banned for the trolling, save for the use of this exploit. Your attitude on the discord and forum doesn't seem much different either.