Would you like any of these proposals implemented? 12
-
Vouch for Proposal 1 (6) 50%
-
Object to Proposal 1 (2) 17%
-
Vouch for Proposal 2 (1) 8%
-
Object to Proposal 2 (3) 25%
Title is just clickbait.
For starters, I would appreciate if you would read the following two threads for background:
https://forum.totalfreedom.me/d/434-executiv…by-the-owner/19
https://forum.totalfreedom.me/d/437-exclude-…ner-vote-off/13
Since the original thread by RedEastWood was withdrawn I wanted to create this thread to keep the discussion going.
Simply put, I don’t think it’s a good idea to have the server owner appoint executives when those same executives are the ones who decide whether a vote-off is to be held or not. Thus, this is a blatant corruption issue that should be amended.
I have two proposals that both will mitigate this problem:
1) Have executives appointed by the general community, Admin community, a council or another person OTHER than the owner to prevent this possible cronyism. This doesn't mean we have to revert to the old system we had in place previously, but that is also an option.
2) Remove the need for executives to decide whether or not to have a vote for the owner’s removal. Thus, if people (Or simply Admin(s)) wish to stage a vote-off they could.
I didn’t agree with the premise of the thread, but I saw it as a better alternative than having the owner-appointed executives decide whether or not to remove the owner, who might’ve instated them.