From what I have seen most new admins just go inactive when they get the role or they are active for a few months and then go inactive so I was thinking why not have activity requirement for when admins go inactive or new admins going inactive like a few days after they get role
Should there be a activity requirement for new admins and inactive admins
-
-
neutral
would be better if we prevented the inactive admins from coming back so quickly by making them go through a vote… i really don’t see why they don’t have to
-
No.
-
There is a current "minimum activity requirement" of 12 hours a month. It isn't much to begin with and even if an admin is busy with life, it ain't hard to clock in 1 hour a day for 12 days to meet the requirement. And for reinstating admins, its generally expected that they have some sort of playtime established before reinstating. In the case of admins coming back and going inactive again and especially if they are known for it, the EAO can put them on a probationary period before restoring their full rank.
Quote↩ @'wxtermelon' would be better if we prevented the inactive admins from coming back so quickly by making them go through a vote…
Staff are permitted to vote on reinstatement applications. The EAO is the one to make a final judgement based upon any votes.
I Object to any changes to the current policy.
-
-
wild1145
Moved the thread from forum Imported from Flarum to forum General Discussion.
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!