Quote↩ enchy why are you trying so hard to not admit depp might not be an abuser? depp has no history or pattern of violence, while amber does. there is also no evidence depp was physically abusive, while there is evidence heard was. anything past that is not following evidence and instead making shit up. you cant seem to admit that depp isnt an abuser. do you think that the only way heard was violent was abusive was if she was provoked?
Neither here nor there but abuse is not strictly limited to physical offense. While johnny doesn't have a history of physical abuse, he does have a history of drug + alcohol usage and verbal abuse. For this there is evidence (phone calls) of Johnny verbally insulting and berating heard. Even then, Amber isn't the white knight of this situation either as she does also have a history of verbal abuse. My stance is that neither of them are innocent and we should be very careful to not be too biased for either side. Just because Amber is guilty does not make Johnny innocent and we shouldn't treat him that way