Admin application

Object I would vouch but I just don't know you that much

I Object. One of the first discrepancies I've seen is in question 2. You didn't even list your IGN which it asks for. Your playtime is quite lacking - admins are generally expected to be reasonably active with a minimum activity requirement of 12 hours per month which isn't much - playing for an hour 12 days out of a month is all that is required to maintain admin status. I searched up your username and the playtime median is 36 seconds and you have a total active playtime of only 7 hours 23 minutes over a span of several months. I recommend becoming more active and establishing yourself in the community before applying. With such limited activity, I get the impression of this being an attempt to get power and I feel you are not committed to the server enough to be considered for the title either. Also, you used a crash chest to try and crash the server. Definitely not admin material.
Your total playtime is well below the minimum requirements as well.

ok

↩ @'fndndjdnsnsn'

i probably wont be a tmod even and thats ok

↩  MagAgentV3

thanks

Quote

↩  ThanatosXYZ i probably wont be a tmod even and thats ok

We dont have trial mods. or mods at all really.

Quote

↩ @'fndndjdnsnsn' active member

I genuinely feel like you vouch on many applications for these same vague reasons. This is not to attack your votes but rather to ask that you consider them more carefully. This specific example where you vouch for this “active” user, when it is clear they are not.

I have seen multiple votes from many members that don’t seem to have much thought put into them. Nobody is obliged to vote. If you don’t want to take the time to consider a vote, you don’t need to. I think it is in the communities best interest that we promote quality voting over a larger quantity of votes.

As per section 13 of the pre-application checklist, can you add a profile picture to your forum account?

going to object -- so far i've never seen you around here before, up until this application, mainly on the server, which makes me question how active you actually will be, especially since alco has mentioned your current activity stats above..

Object. Player placed down wurst crash chests with a lot of copies inside.

I've already had a few pressing concerns about your lack of apparent presence on the server, lack of activity and the small issue of you not properly adhering to the pre application checklist despite you having agreed to its terms. It was only a profile picture, but you did agree to have read and followed them.

However as other admins are about to provide evidence for, you have just been banned for attempting to harm the server using wurst crash chests. This in my eyes is completely unacceptable especially just hours after applying.

You're closer to the indefinite bans list than the saconfig list right now. Object.

object, ur playtime is significantly low compared to other admins and admin applicants, plus i myself havent seen you around before yesterday so i cant trust you easily

additionally, earlier today the applicant attempted to harm the server using wurst crash chests

logs below:

Quote

!

https://forum.totalfreedom.me/d/4033-brillia…-for-no-reason/

no

I object, given https://forum.totalfreedom.me/d/4033-brillia…-for-no-reason/ existed it shows the applicant has lied on the first question, because they quite clearly have not read the community guidelines and associated documents.

Object, your activity is alot lower than most admins, and given the situation that happened between you and pkz and the way you handled it, i personally dont think you are ready to take on such a role.

eh no object

↩  ThanatosXYZ Object, i've personally never seen you online.

Never seen you online. Ever. Object.

↩ @'elevent (smugd)'

Smart man, different timezones and play times