Quote↩ @'r00t' quack makes immature decisions in TFGU discord, leaves TotalFreedom “forever”. Infinity is abandoned, alongside the “new base” (which was never finished, apparently)
Feel like there's a bit of a grudge going on here..
Quote↩ @'r00t' quack makes immature decisions in TFGU discord, leaves TotalFreedom “forever”. Infinity is abandoned, alongside the “new base” (which was never finished, apparently)
Feel like there's a bit of a grudge going on here..
↩ @'r00t' along with a weird ability to keep coming back to things and make vague attempts to revive them
Wait until you see what the development team has in store
↩ @'r00t' you forgot to mention my appointment to ECD before Undertails left
↩ @'wxtermelon' this time tfm will be replaced with nothing and everyone will be given console access
There’s also the appointment of Coco to ECD, Red to EMM, Lyicx to ECM, Tizz to EMM, Lyicx resigning.
add excel making a story
Exec appointments shouldn't really be seen as historically significant as standard IMHO. Wouldn't say that's worthy of being included on a time line.
Why does it start at beta 1.2?
↩ @'wxtermelon' I feel obliged to say there aren't official plans to get rid of TFM yet.
↩ @'Ryan' I disagree, The executives do a lot for the server, without them, I doubt things would run smoothly at all, its nice to give them the recognition they deserve. If you want to not have that much exec appointment on the timeline, at the very least, all the EAO's should be
↩ DragonSlayer2189 same thing could be said about developers and their appointments but I don’t think either positions are significant enough to be included in a timeline of the servers entire history’s
↩ DragonSlayer2189 Then what they do should be on the time line if it's significant. Appointing an executive is not and should never be significant on its own.
I haven't mentioned any appointment of executives, and or developers since it doesn't deem necessary in my eyes, it's also too much work at this point to go and see every executive that ever served.